Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.29231

DisasterRoute: Evidence-Guided Dual-System Routing for Visual Disaster Question Answering

Tan Zhang·Xing Deng·Lu Zhang·Xiaofeng Zhu·Ping Hu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Visual question answering from low-altitude UAV imagery must deliver timely and accurate judgments to support disaster response under limited edge computing resources. Routine questions may be answered through direct decisions, whereas more challenging questions may benefit from step-by-step reasoning. However, existing research primarily focuses on improving models' visual understanding and generative reasoning capabilities, with limited exploration of efficient direct decision-making and its adaptive coordination with generative reasoning. We develop Disaster-S1 based on a vision-language model adapted to the disaster domain. Trained for option discrimination, it outputs a probability distribution over answer options in a single multimodal forward pass for fast decision-making. We further propose DisasterRoute, a dual-system routing framework that combines prediction confidence with disaster evidence to decide whether to accept the initial answer or invoke the disaster reasoning model DisasterVL for review. By allocating inference computation on demand, the framework retains the efficiency of direct decision-making and improves overall question-answering accuracy through selective review. Experiments on DisasterBench show that Disaster-S1 achieves superior accuracy with low latency, while DisasterRoute further improves accuracy through selective review at substantially lower latency than full reasoning.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tan Zhang, Xing Deng, Lu Zhang, Xiaofeng Zhu, Ping Hu. 2026-10-21. DisasterRoute: Evidence-Guided Dual-System Routing for Visual Disaster Question Answering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29231

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bilateral Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Flatter Minima

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) enhances generalization by reducing a Max-Sharpness (MaxS). Despite the practical success, we empirically found that the MAxS behind SAM's generalization enhancements face the "Flatness Indicator Problem" (FIP), where SAM only considers the flatness in the direction of gradient ascent, resulting in a next minimization region that is not sufficiently flat. A better Flatness Indicator (FI) would bring a better generalization of neural networks. Because SAM is a greedy search method in nature. In this paper, we propose to utilize the difference between the training loss and the minimum loss over the neighborhood surrounding the current weight, which we denote as Min-Sharpness (MinS). By merging MaxS and MinS, we created a better FI that indicates a flatter direction during the optimization. Specially, we combine this FI with SAM into the proposed Bilateral SAM (BSAM) which finds a more flatter minimum than that of SAM. The theoretical analysis proves that BSAM converges to local minima. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BSAM offers superior generalization performance and robustness compared to vanilla SAM across various tasks, i.e., classification, transfer learning, human pose estimation, and network quantization.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Understanding Transformer-Based Vision Models via Modular Feature Inversion

Understanding the internal mechanisms of deep neural networks remains a central challenge in machine learning. In computer vision, one promising yet only preliminarily explored approach is feature inversion via inverse networks, which reconstructs images from intermediate representations using trained inverse networks. In this study, we revisit feature inversion via inverse networks, introducing a novel, modular variant that enables a computationally more efficient application of the technique while, in some cases, producing semantically more coherent image reconstructions. We apply our method to large-scale transformer-based vision models, specifically Detection Transformer, Vision Transformer, Swin Transformer, and Data-Efficient Image Transformer, analyzing the resulting reconstructions across network depth. Our main analysis compares Detection Transformer and Vision Transformer, which exhibit the most informative differences among the evaluated architectures. At the same time, results for Swin Transformer and Data-Efficient Image Transformer support the broader applicability of our framework. Our findings reveal gradual representational changes across transformer layers as a shared characteristic of Detection Transformer and Vision Transformer, as well as systematic differences in how they preserve contextual shape and fine-grained image details, and in their robustness to color perturbations. These findings deepen understanding of transformer-based vision models and demonstrate the utility of modular feature inversion as an interpretability tool.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs

Humans develop perception through a bottom-up hierarchy: from basic primitives and Gestalt principles to high-level semantics. Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are trained directly on complex downstream tasks. Does it guarantee their performance on these foundational visual capabilities? To systematically investigate this gap, we introduce VisFacor, a benchmark that digitizes 20 vision-centric subtests from FRCT, a well-established cognitive psychology assessment spanning four domains of human visual cognition. Furthermore, we design algorithms to automatically construct and validate unlimited test cases with controllable difficulty. Using VisFacor, we evaluate 39 frontier MLLMs, including both proprietary (e.g., GPT, Gemini) and open-source (e.g., LLaMA, Qwen) models. The best model achieves a score of only 55.9%. Analysis reveals good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and construct validity (compared to existing vision benchmarks). Models consistently fail on tasks such as mental rotation, spatial relation inference, and figure-ground discrimination, regardless of model size or prompting strategy. These findings suggest that performance improvements on existing general benchmarks might represent castles in the air instead of a genuine mastery of human-like visual cognition.

cs.CV↗