arXiv · 2610.29234
Learning Marginal Viewpoint Utility for Budgeted Evidence Selection in RAG
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation over multi-viewpoint queries must preserve distinct answers and positions from the retrieved evidence while operating under a fixed context budget. We introduce LMVU, a lightweight ranker that learns to prioritize candidates by the marginal viewpoint coverage they add to the current selection. Training uses viewpoint annotations from each benchmark's development split to compare candidates within the same selection state. At inference, LMVU repeatedly scores budget-feasible candidates as the context grows, without accessing these annotations. We evaluate two forms of recovered viewpoint coverage: RVC$_1$ assigns each viewpoint full credit for at least one supporting source unit, while RVC$_2$ assigns half credit for one and full credit for two or more distinct source units. Exact oracles measure achievable coverage under the same evidence pool and budget. Across four viewpoint-annotated benchmarks at a 1,024-token budget, LMVU achieves gains of up to 0.047 and 0.052 points in RVC$_1$ and RVC$_2$, respectively, over the strongest non-oracle baseline for each benchmark and metric, and reaches the exact viewpoint-breadth ceiling on two benchmarks.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Yiyang Duan, Ziqi Yu, Tiantong Wu, Yebo Wu, Wei Yang Bryan Lim. 2026-10-21. Learning Marginal Viewpoint Utility for Budgeted Evidence Selection in RAG. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29234
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.