Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.29584

A Computer-Assisted Proof that R(5,10;5,8)=21 for the Generalized Threshold Ramsey Number

Abstract

We prove that the generalized threshold Ramsey number R(5,10;5,8) equals 21. This number corresponds to the set Ramsey number r_5(10,8) introduced by Harborth. The proof is computer-assisted. We first enumerate all (4,6;5,8)-good and (5,10;4,4)-good graphs. Then we apply the lucky-vertex inequality derived from the McKay--Radziszowski edge identity to filter candidate pairs for a gluing search, and encode the remaining cases as SAT instances. The search yields exactly 17 non-isomorphic (5,10;5,8;20)-good graphs. Finally, we exclude all one-vertex extensions of these 17 graphs, which proves that no (5,10;5,8;21)-good graph exists.Additionally, we update the tabulation of small set Ramsey numbers r_5(m,n) for 1 <= m,n <= 10.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wancai Guo, Min Wan. 2026-10-21. A Computer-Assisted Proof that R(5,10;5,8)=21 for the Generalized Threshold Ramsey Number. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29584

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Cluster scattering diagrams of acyclic affine type

We give an explicit construction of the cluster scattering diagram for any acyclic exchange matrix of affine type. We show that the corresponding cluster scattering fan coincides both with the mutation fan and with a fan constructed in the almost-positive roots model.

math.CO↗

Embeddability of hieroglyphs in the torus and the intersection form

We characterize the hieroglyphs that embed in the torus, where a hieroglyph is a one-vertex graph with a rotation system. We prove equivalent criteria in terms of four forbidden hieroglyphs, the structure of the loop graph, reductions to three terminal forms, and the rank of the interlacement matrix. The proof uses the intersection form on the first homology of a disc with bands over $\mathbb{F}_2$ and the equality between its rank and twice the genus. We describe the effect of reductions and the role of boundary components. Counting the cycles of the boundary permutation yields a linear-time recognition algorithm for an indexed representation of the input.

math.CO↗

Locked Polyomino Tilings

A locked $t$-omino tiling is a grid tiling by $t$-ominoes such that, if you remove any pair of tiles, the only way to fill in the remaining $2t$ grid cells with $t$-ominoes is to use the same two tiles in the exact same configuration as before. We exclude degenerate cases where there is only one tiling overall due to small dimensions. It is a classic (and straightforward) result that finite grids do not admit locked 2-omino tilings. In this paper, we construct explicit locked $t$-omino tilings for $t\geq3$ on square and rectangular grids of various dimensions. We show that locked 3- and 4-omino tilings exist on finite square grids of arbitrarily large size. The result for 4-omino tilings in particular is remarkable because they are so rare and difficult to construct: Only a single tiling is known to exist on any grid up to size $40\times40$. We also find locked 5- and 6-omino tilings, and provide a computer-assisted proof that locked 7-omino tilings do not exist on any rectangular grid. In a weighted version of the problem where vertices of the grid may have weights from the set $\{1,2\}$ that count toward the total tile size, we demonstrate the existence of locked tilings on arbitrarily large square weighted grids with only 6 tiles. Finally, we construct locked $t$-omino tilings of the infinite grid for arbitrarily large $t$. Locked $t$-omino tilings arise as obstructions to widely used political redistricting algorithms in a model of redistricting where the underlying census geography is a grid graph. Most prominent is the ReCom Markov chain, which takes a random walk on the space of redistricting plans by iteratively merging and splitting pairs of districts (tiles) at a time. Locked $t$-omino tilings are isolated states in the state space of ReCom. The constructions in this paper are counterexamples to the meta-conjecture that ReCom is irreducible on graphs of practical interest.

math.CO↗