Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.29805

The morphology of contact binary objects in the Solar System

Richard E. Cannon·Agata Rożek·Colin Snodgrass
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Contact binaries, appearing as two objects stuck together, are prevalent throughout the Solar System, making up between 30- 50% of asteroids and comets. Despite this, detailed shape models of contact binaries are hard to obtain remotely, requiring rare occultation events or close approaches to Earth (< 0.1 au) to observe with ground-based radar systems. Despite only 16 contact binary models being published, there already exists a wide variety of different arrangements of the two lobes relative to one another. At the same time, simulations of contact binary object formation are increasing in scale, producing 10s to 1000s of contact binary candidates per simulation. It is therefore necessary to begin the process of characterising the different shapes observed, and to further investigate any emerging trends. We analyse the size, period, neck prominence, volume distribution, ratio between the sizes and volumes of the individual lobes, and the alignment between them to summarise the extent of the currently modelled asteroids.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.EP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Richard E. Cannon, Agata Rożek, Colin Snodgrass. 2026-10-21. The morphology of contact binary objects in the Solar System. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29805

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A 36.34-day Sub-Neptune Candidate Transiting the Nearby K Dwarf TIC 402710280

Transiting sub-Neptunes on orbits longer than a month are rare around bright stars. We report a candidate with a 36.34-day period around TIC 402710280, a $V = 10.0$ K dwarf at 66.8 pc that the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) has observed only in full-frame images. Four transits from 2021 to 2026, reduced by three independent pipelines, have consistent depths (mean $2092 \pm 47$ ppm) and a duration of $5.27 \pm 0.05$ h. Two are 36.36 days apart. The light curves exclude every shorter period consistent with both down to one day, and the duration disfavors still shorter ones, leaving $P = 36.33986 \pm 0.00051$ d. The candidate's radius is $3.75 \pm 0.22\,R_\oplus$ and its equilibrium temperature $498 \pm 21$ K. Difference-image centroids place the signal $1.5'' \pm 1.3''$ from the target, and eclipse models of the only nearby Gaia source, $3.5''$ away, fit worse than a planet by $Δχ^2 \geq 142$ for every main-sequence pair. TRICERATOPS gives a false-positive probability of $0.003 \pm 0.004$; without high-resolution imaging, the object remains a candidate. The transit times scatter about a linear ephemeris by 21.8 min (rms), and an independent reduction reproduces the largest departure. Four transits cannot separate timing systematics from transit-timing variations. A second signal, of $407 \pm 26$ ppm at 3.78 days, may come from the target, an unresolved companion, or the background star. We predict a transit in TESS Sector 114 on 2027 February 19.

astro-ph.EP↗
arXiv2026

A sub-Earth-sized TESS planet candidate in the nearby M-dwarf binary GJ 774, most likely orbiting GJ 774 A (TIC 351339274)

Small planets transiting the nearest M dwarfs are the terrestrial planets most accessible to detailed characterisation. We report a sub-Earth-sized transiting planet candidate in the wide (17.6") M-dwarf binary GJ 774 at 12.86 pc, most likely orbiting the M2.5 primary GJ 774 A (TIC 351339274). The signal was a SPOC multi-sector threshold-crossing event (MES = 7.95) and is not a TESS Object of Interest. In eight TESS sectors (2019-2026) a 1.28-h transit recurs every 4.225138 +/- 0.000010 d with a box-mean depth of 365 +/- 32 ppm in A's light. The 2026 data, which entered neither the SPOC search nor our selection, show it at the ephemeris predicted from 2019-2023 data (304 +/- 43 ppm; none of 10^5 phase-scrambled versions of the 2026 data is as deep). The per-target false-alarm probability is < 0.03 at 95%. Odd/even, secondary-eclipse, archival-plate and Gaia radial-velocity tests exclude unrelated blended eclipsing binaries and eclipsing companions on 4.2-d orbits, and hierarchical eclipsing binaries are improbable. The stars are 0.85 TESS pixel apart, so the TRICERATOPS false-positive probability (0.26) is set by a planet on GJ 774 B. B is disfavoured because its own light does not dim enough: PRF-deblended photometry gives 109 +/- 115 ppm in B's light, against 1089 ppm required if B were the host. Conditional on a point source at A or at B, the joint host model gives P(A)=0.59-0.97 (0.97 for the native target-pixel baseline). Over all sectors the PRF photometry is consistent with A, but in the out-of-sample 2026 data 40% of the deficit appears at B's position, an unexplained 2-3 sigma (PSF-model and depth dependent) tension with host A. On A the planet has R_p=0.70 +/- 0.06 R_Earth, S=15.0 +/- 1.8 S_Earth and T_eq=548 +/- 16 K. It is not validated; resolved ground-based photometry of the pair would test host B directly.

astro-ph.EP↗
arXiv2026

Uncertainty estimation of incoming comet trajectories with a thermophysical non-gravitational force model for Comet Interceptor encounter planning

The European Space Agency Comet Interceptor mission is designed to fly-by an as-yet undetermined incoming long-period or dynamically-new comet, which will require an accurate prediction of its trajectory. Cometary orbits are perturbed from purely gravitational trajectories by non-gravitational accelerations (NGAs) stemming from their outgassing, however, and these must be taken into account in the navigation. We here test the ability of ground-based astrometry and standard NGA-fitting techniques to predict the position and velocity of incoming comets perturbed by a Monte Carlo sampled thermophysical acceleration model. We find that, due to the difficulties of predicting NGA evolution as well as the limitations of reasonably simulated astrometry, predicted accuracies are unlikely to meet the mission goals of 1000 km and 1 m s$^{-1}$ in position and velocity, sixty days before intercept. We instead recommend expanded uncertainties of $10,000$ km and several m s$^{-1}$. Our NGA fits struggle to reproduce the reference accelerations and trajectories when outgassing is rising steeply at a few AU-incoming, but with more observations up until perihelion, do eventually converge, leading to good estimates of many of the underlying acceleration parameters even for half an orbital arc.

astro-ph.EP↗