Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.29924

Geospatial Dynamics of Online Attention to Nuclear Power in Japan Before and After Fukushima

Abstract

Nuclear power is increasingly seen as necessary for sustainable development, but this role depends on informed public engagement and support. Building this support requires understanding what citizens want to know, as reflected in their spontaneous online searches. To map this demand, we present the first long-term (2004-2024), prefecture-level analysis of Google Trends data on nuclear power in Japan. The results indicate that in routine periods, search interest followed a host-locality pattern, being significantly higher in prefectures hosting nuclear plants, with little spillover to their neighbors. Immediately after the Fukushima Daiichi accident in March 2011, this pattern changed, and interest instead declined with distance from Fukushima, before the host-locality pattern returned from 2012. During March 2011, searches leaned heavily toward general and live information rather than guidance on what to do. Their framing also varied with proximity, as those near Fukushima prioritized live updates and formal countermeasures, while others leaned toward background information and personal-scale questions. These patterns and the shift between them provide a behavioral evidence base for designing communication strategies in Japan and countries weighing the use of nuclear power. More broadly, the finding that searches vary with proximity can inform public communication in other geographically anchored crises.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yifan Sun, Ken Kurosaki, Benjamin C. McLellan. 2026-10-21. Geospatial Dynamics of Online Attention to Nuclear Power in Japan Before and After Fukushima. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29924

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Schadenfreude in the Digital Public Sphere: A Cross-National, Decade-Long Analysis of Facebook News Engagement

Pleasure at the misfortune of others, or schadenfreude, is widely believed to have become a routine feature of online news audiences, yet its prevalence and social patterning have rarely been measured at scale. Here, we examine ten years (2015-2024) of Facebook engagement with misfortune news across nine major outlets spanning the political spectrum in the United States, the United Kingdom, and India. We separate schadenfreude, in which a commenter expresses pleasure at the misfortune, from hostility without pleasure, using an ensemble of three open-weight language models validated against human annotation, and classify 1.06 million post-comment pairs. We find that schadenfreude constitutes 26% of comments on news covering misfortune, a third more than the rate implied by "Haha" reactions on the same posts, and that the two measures agree at the post level (Spearman $ρ= 0.43$) while hostility does not ($ρ= 0.07$). Schadenfreude varies by less than one percentage point across the three countries and concentrates where theories of deserved suffering predict: on misfortunes framed as self-inflicted, on scandals and defeats rather than deaths, and on public figures rather than ordinary people. Hostility, in contrast, varies widely across outlets and responds to politics. Audiences of a left-leaning US outlet became 5.5 percentage points less hostile while their party held the presidency, a pattern robust across specifications, whereas no comparable power effect on schadenfreude survives robustness checks. Cross-national differences that a toxicity-based measure attributes to schadenfreude turn out, under the pleasure-explicit measure, to be differences in hostility. These results show that schadenfreude is a measurable mode of news engagement, distinct from toxicity and patterned by the moral structure of misfortune rather than by country or political power.

cs.SI↗

Measuring Healthcare Accessibility and Resilience for Smart and Connected Rural Communities: A Florida Panhandle Case Study

Rural communities in the United States face persistent healthcare disparities, with fewer providers and facilities, longer trips to care, lower health literacy, and weaker transportation and broadband infrastructure than their non-rural counterparts. Beyond any single barrier, healthcare accessibility is shaped jointly by the geographic availability of services, residents' ability to reach those services, realized utilization, and the capacity of local systems to remain operational during disruptions, which are often examined separately and at coarse spatial scales, limiting their usefulness for community planning. We present a fine-grained, multi-source longitudinal measurement study of healthcare accessibility in Florida, with a focus on the hurricane-prone Florida Panhandle. We integrate healthcare-facility points of service, monthly mobility records from January 2018 through April 2021, Census Block Group (CBG)-level demographic data, and road-network data to compare rural and non-rural communities from supply, travel, utilization, and resilience perspectives. We find that 95.57% of the Panhandle's land area is rural and that 46.7% of rural CBGs contain no healthcare facility in the pooled inventory. Rural residents have less than half the per-capita facility availability of non-rural residents. These disparities remain after measured demographic adjustment, while longitudinal patterns reveal substantial disruptions around Hurricane Michael and COVID-19. Building on this evidence, we formulate an actionable planning framework that combines E2SFCA-based access estimation, stakeholder-weighted prioritization, and constrained deployment models for mobile clinics, non-emergency medical transportation, telehealth, and disaster-resilient services. The study demonstrates how community-oriented spatial intelligence can support equitable and resilient healthcare planning in rural regions.

cs.SI↗

Characterizing Social Media Behavior under Limited Observability: Retweet Link Prediction and Multimodal Intention Recognition

Social-media behavior can be observed through both interaction structure and multimodal content, yet each view is often incomplete. We study two complementary tasks on separate datasets: predicting retweet links from an extremely sparse graph without node attributes, and generating user intentions from text-image posts with limited annotations. For link prediction, we use a leakage-controlled transductive protocol to compare GCN and GraphSAGE, classical topology heuristics, and three node-input designs. Across repeated runs, a GCN with compact degree and strength features achieves an average precision of 0.9243 and an MCC of 0.7051. Under joint edge-label corruption, topology-based GCNs retain strong ranking performance, whereas fixed-threshold MCC degrades substantially; adding fixed random node identifiers does not improve overall robustness. For intention recognition, we retain the MIKO framework and evaluate LoRA adaptation of three language models together with distribution-aware sampling based on Pearson correlation, cosine similarity, and KL divergence. Fine-tuning consistently improves lexical-overlap metrics, while distribution-aware sampling produces more uniform performance across intention types. Together, the two studies characterize who interacts and why users post when social-media observations are sparse, noisy, or limited.

cs.SI↗