Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.31683

The Schema Coherence Inventory: Measuring Whether an Assigned Belief Organizes a Language Model's Cognition

Abstract

Persona-conditioned language models are used as simulated patients and affective agents, but there is no validated way to ask whether a belief assigned to such a model organizes its behaviour or whether the model has merely adopted a mood. We present the Schema Coherence Inventory (SCI): 96 forced-choice items at eight levels of Beck's cognitive model, each offering six replies keyed to three negative self-schemas and their positive counterparts, scored by length-normalized log-likelihood so that nothing is generated or parsed. Affect alone can move a model onto a default belief, so the discriminant criterion is target specificity: a condition built for one belief must select that belief more often than conditions built for the other beliefs of its pole. Six validation studies over 107 conditions on five backbones (1.7B-14B parameters) support this reading. Nine clinically trained raters recover the keyed belief at 79.5% (chance 16.7%). Belief adapters are target-specific on every backbone (+17.7 points; 30/30 belief cells positive), and a condition's SCI profile identifies its own free generations in 24/30 cases against 5 expected by chance. A 48-item short form correlates r = 0.73 with the other 48 items. Applied to six published patient simulators, none carries its formulation's core belief better than a one-sentence statement of it. The validation route, which separates a construct from the affect that accompanies it and checks model judges against clinicians, offers a template for affective measurement in language models; we outline its extension across task types, raters, sites and languages. We release the items, scoring code and short form.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuqi Wu, Deyang Li, Katharine Hibbard, Ron Oswald, David Sinclair, Adegboyega Sapara, Kalutota Kuruwe Arachchige Sajana Indula Samarasinghe, Abhinav Pillai, Reham Shalaby, Riffat Alam, Xin-Min Li, Yanbo Zhang, Jie Chen. 2026-10-03. The Schema Coherence Inventory: Measuring Whether an Assigned Belief Organizes a Language Model's Cognition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31683

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

From Statistical Methods to Pre-Trained Models; A Survey on Automatic Speech Recognition for Resource Scarce Urdu Language

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) technology has witnessed significant advancements in recent years, revolutionizing human-computer interactions. While major languages have benefited from these developments, lesser-resourced languages like Urdu face unique challenges. This paper provides an extensive exploration of the dynamic landscape of ASR research, focusing particularly on the resource-constrained Urdu language, which is widely spoken across South Asian nations. It outlines current research trends, technological advancements, and potential directions for future studies in Urdu ASR, aiming to pave the way for forthcoming researchers interested in this domain. By leveraging contemporary technologies, analyzing existing datasets, and evaluating effective algorithms and tools, the paper seeks to shed light on the unique challenges and opportunities associated with Urdu language processing and its integration into the broader field of speech research.

cs.CL↗

Joint Detection of Fraud and Concept Drift inOnline Conversations with LLM-Assisted Judgment

Detecting fake interactions in digital communication platforms remains a challenging and insufficiently addressed problem. These interactions may appear as harmless spam or escalate into sophisticated scam attempts, making it difficult to flag malicious intent early. Traditional detection methods often rely on static anomaly detection techniques that fail to adapt to dynamic conversational shifts. One key limitation is the misinterpretation of benign topic transitions referred to as concept drift as fraudulent behavior, leading to either false alarms or missed threats. We propose a two stage detection framework that first identifies suspicious conversations using a tailored ensemble classification model. To improve the reliability of detection, we incorporate a concept drift analysis step using a One Class Drift Detector (OCDD) to isolate conversational shifts within flagged dialogues. When drift is detected, a large language model (LLM) assesses whether the shift indicates fraudulent manipulation or a legitimate topic change. In cases where no drift is found, the behavior is inferred to be spam like. We validate our framework using a dataset of social engineering chat scenarios and demonstrate its practical advantages in improving both accuracy and interpretability for real time fraud detection. To contextualize the trade offs, we compare our modular approach against a Dual LLM baseline that performs detection and judgment using different language models.

cs.CL↗

SAFE: An LLM-as-Verifier Framework for Evidence-Grounded Multi-Hop Reasoning

Multi-hop QA benchmarks often reward Large Language Models (LLMs) for spurious correctness, where models reach correct answers through invalid intermediate reasoning. We propose SAFE, an LLM-as-verifier framework for evidence-grounded multi-hop QA. Rather than judging only the final answer after generation, SAFE verifies reasoning during generation by checking intermediate steps against the provided passages and previous reasoning trajectory. To make this process checkable, SAFE decomposes reasoning into atomic, evidence-grounded units represented with Knowledge Graph (KG) triples. At train-time, SAFE verifies benchmark supervision under KG-grounded constraints and constructs reliable verifier training data. At inference-time, an external verifier checks each generated step, identifies invalid reasoning, and provides correction feedback before errors propagate. Across three multi-hop QA benchmarks, SAFE improves accuracy by 8.8 pp on average. These results show that evidence-grounded multi-hop QA benefits from shifting LLM-based evaluation from post-hoc answer judgment to stepwise reasoning verification.

cs.CL↗