Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.32257

When Simple Is Enough: Resource-Aware Heuristic versus DDQN for O-RAN Mobility Robustness

Abstract

Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) enables mobility-management xApps, but a learned controller is not necessarily the most effective or efficient handover policy. This paper compares standard Event A3, a resource- and mobility-aware heuristic, and a Double Deep Q-Network (DDQN) through a common xApp-oriented interface and paired system-level simulation. The heuristic combines radio quality, target-cell resources, UE mobility, and service class, with weights optimized offline using NSGA-II, while DDQN-Multi uses temporal radio and resource observations. All controllers are evaluated on identical UE trajectories, traffic assignments, and ray-traced radio inputs under Base, High-Mobility, and High-UE scenarios. Performance is assessed using service, handover, resource, energy, and fairness KPIs, complemented by CRITIC--TOPSIS ranking and complexity analysis. Results show that the heuristic achieves the lowest outage in all three scenarios and ranks first in the CRITIC--TOPSIS comparison, while retaining linear online complexity and interpretable decisions. DDQN-Multi improves target feasibility under congestion but requires offline training and produces more handovers and ping-pong events. The results indicate that lightweight resource-aware control can provide a favourable performance-complexity trade-off relative to DDQN under the considered scenarios.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ali Deylamy, Nima Afraz. 2026-10-23. When Simple Is Enough: Resource-Aware Heuristic versus DDQN for O-RAN Mobility Robustness. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32257

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Experimental Classification of xApp Conflicts in O-RAN: Slicing vs. Per-UE Scheduling

Concurrent applications (xApps) in the Near-Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller (Near-RT RIC) of the Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) can issue control intents that are jointly infeasible when they act on hierarchically coupled radio resources. This paper experimentally studies an interaction between slice-level physical resource block (PRB) allocation and per-user-equipment (UE) scheduling. We implement a utilisation-aware slicing control (the spectral-efficiency xApp) that reclaims a fixed fraction of the baseline allocation from under-utilised slices and redistributes pooled capacity to saturated slices. The control logic is exercised in simulation and on a 5G testbed comprising an OCUDU-based next-generation NodeB (gNB), an Open5GS core, a Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) X310, and five commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) UEs. Because the gNB counters available in this testbed are UE-keyed but not slice-labelled, the slicing control derives a per-slice throughput proxy from core-side traffic measurements. A command-bus detector evaluates explicitly defined control-intent conditions: a per-UE floor above its parent-slice cap, aggregate UE floors above the cell budget, and repeated slice-target changes within a specified window. Over a 276-cycle continuous run, the detector logged 147 per-slice floor--cap violations, 49 shared-budget over-subscription episodes, and 11 allocation-oscillation episodes. Against the conventional static slice split replayed on the same load trace, the slicing control reduces unmet demand by 12--33\,\% and idle allocation by 21--23\,\%. The results demonstrate reproducible cross-granularity control-intent interactions on real hardware and provide an experimental basis for analysing conflict detection in O-RAN.

cs.NI↗

Quantum-Classical Link Prediction on Dark Web Hyperlink Graphs

We analyze HTML content and hyperlinks from an offline Tor crawl containing 383 onion hosts and 2,067 directed cross-host links. The study combines semantic analysis with degree-controlled quantum--classical link prediction. Two directory groups emit 94.8\% of the observed host links. Directed preferential attachment reaches ROC-AUC 0.976 with random non-edges, but falls to $0.550\pm0.014$ under source-conditioned target-degree matching. With disjoint training and test pairs, multimodal logistic regression reaches $0.672\pm0.021$, GAE $0.899\pm0.016$, and VGAE $0.906\pm0.016$. A four-qubit variational quantum classifier (VQC) comparison tests two encodings across 20 disjoint-pair graph splits under exact and 1,024-shot simulation, with classical controls using the same inputs and training examples. Its best exact mean ROC-AUC is $0.549\pm0.023$, compared with $0.551\pm0.016$ for RBF SVC and $0.573\pm0.029$ for a 16-parameter MLP on the same inputs and training examples. These results support predictive signal in combined graph/content features and show why degree control, feature compression, and optimization conditions matter in quantum--classical comparisons.

cs.NI↗

GLP Networking API Specification

Multiagent deterministic GLP (madGLP) runs Grassroots Logic Programs (GLP) as agents that communicate solely by asynchronous message passing, and assumes fair delivery: every message sent is eventually delivered. Each agent runs on a person's smartphone, named by the person's public key. A grassroots platform depends on no global resource but the network, so agents must reach one another over Bluetooth Low Energy, on a local network, and across the Internet from behind NAT, via rendezvous servers anyone can run. What madGLP requires of such a network, and what the network requires of the platform, has not been specified. We specify the networking layer beneath madGLP. Anything that can be done in GLP is done in GLP: the layer provides only what GLP cannot reach - the network stack, the location service, application attestation, and cryptographic primitives. Three transport underlays share one interface. Over PAN and LAN, an agent advertises a rotating recognition token derived from its key and time slot, so a peer who knows the key recognises it before contact and nobody else can track it; whether it answers unrecognised contacts is a per-underlay trust level set by GLP. Over WAN, a rendezvous server is a static-address host running the headless layer and a GLP rendezvous agent that coordinates hole punching, relays no payload, and belongs to no social graph. On every underlay, peers establish a mutually authenticated Noise session from Ed25519 keys, then attest, bound to the handshake hash, that each runs the application published under its developer's key, verified against Apple's and Google's roots with no third party contacted. One message protocol, over UDP datagrams and GATT writes, provides the fair, unordered, atomic and authenticated delivery madGLP assumes.

cs.NI↗