Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.33830

On tame amenable flows and generalized Newelski's conjecture

Abstract

We are developing some topological dynamics below a given ambit. We define and study Bohr compactifications below ambits and other related objects. We describe a natural epimorphism from the Ellis group of an ambit to the Bohr compactification below its Ellis semigroup ambit. The first main result says that, assuming tameness and hereditary amenability, this natural map is an isomorphism of topological groups. This is an abstract dynamical generalization of Newelski's conjecture, or rather a theorem of Chernikov and Simon that a natural map from the Ellis group of the flow $(S_G(M),G)$ to the definable Bohr compactification of $G$ is an isomorphism when $G$ is a definably amenable group definable in a NIP structure $M$. We give two proofs of our main result: a shorter dynamical proof and an analytic proof. In the course of the dynamical proof, we prove some results on the universal compactification flow and on the generalized Bohr compactification below a given ambit which admits a left continuous semigroup operation extending the action of $G$. The considerations around the analytic proof yield a description of the measured structure of amenable tame minimal flows, which is the second main result of this paper. We also study specializations of the above abstract topological dynamics context to model theory contexts to recover some known and to obtain some new notions and results. The main new results in the model theory contexts are: (i) a description of the Bohr compactification of the group of automorphisms of a sufficiently saturated model $\mathfrak{C}$ of a first order theory $T$ below a certain fundamental ambit associated with $\mathfrak{C}$; (ii) transfer of amenability of a NIP theory $T$ to amenability of the Ellis semigroup ambit; (iii) a version of Newelski's conjecture for spaces of local types with a description of Bohr compactifications below such spaces.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Max Hoffmann, Krzysztof Krupiński. 2026-10-24. On tame amenable flows and generalized Newelski's conjecture. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33830

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Infinite unrestricted sumsets in subsets of abelian groups with large density

Let $(G,+)$ be a countable abelian group such that the subgroup $\{g+g\colon g\in G\}$ has finite index and the doubling map $g\mapsto g+g$ has finite kernel. We establish lower bounds on the upper density of a set $A\subset G$ with respect to an appropriate Følner sequence, so that $A$ contains a sumset of the form $\{t+b_1+b_2\colon b_1,b_2\in B\}$ or $\{b_1+b_2\colon b_1,b_2\in B\}$, for some infinite $B\subset G$ and some $t\in G$. Both assumptions on $G$ are necessary for our results to be true. We also characterize the Følner sequences for which this is possible. Finally, we show that our lower bounds are optimal in a strong sense.

math.DS↗

Marchal-type lemmas for the restricted $(N+1)$-body problem with their applications

The direct methods of calculus of variations have had a great success in the classical Newtonian $N$-body problem in this century. First in finding periodic solutions and more recently in the existence of parabolic, hyperbolic and hyperbolic-parabolic solutions. The foundation of many of these results is Marchal's lemma, which guarantee's fixed-end local minimizers are collision-free and hence classical solutions of the $N$-body problem. Meanwhile almost no result is available in the restricted problem through the direct methods of calculus of variations, mainly due to the lack of a Marchal-type lemma. In this paper such a lemma and its variation will be obtained for the restricted problem. We then apply them to the restricted problem to study unbounded (hyperbolic, parabolic, bi-hyperbolic and bi-parabolic) solutions, and bounded (periodic and quasi-periodic) solutions. We emphasize that the extension to the restricted case does not follow from the standard arguement for the unrestricted case.

math.DS↗