Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.34437

Comment on "Test of the Gravitational Force Law on Cosmological Scales Using the Kinematic Sunyaev--Zeldovich Effect''

Abstract

Gallardo et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{136}, 151002 (2026)] constrain the index of the force law $g\propto r^{-n}$ with pairwise kinematic Sunyaev--Zeldovich measurements, $n=2.1\pm0.3$, and exclude the deep-MOND value $n=1$ at $3.3σ$. The exclusion does not follow from their calculation. Their templates for $n\neq2$ [their Eq.~(8)] raise the pair-averaged Newtonian acceleration to the power $n/2$, whereas the pair average of the pointwise law [their Eq.~(30) for deep MOND] is the average of the transformed field; the step that identifies the two attributes to the three-point function a correction that is of second order and not small. In a Gaussian linear field with linearly biased tracers, Gaussian integration by parts shows that the correctly averaged template is exactly proportional to the Newtonian one, with a constant that the analysis absorbs into the mean optical depth. Gaussian realizations with peak-selected tracers find the same proportionality to within 2\% (0.5\% for the fiducial selection), and refitting the data of the Letter with the resulting template gives $χ^2=20.1$--$20.2$, against $20.1$ for the Newtonian template and $33.8$ for Eq.~(8): in every controlled case examined the data do not discriminate between $n=1$ and $n=2$, and the $3.3σ$ exclusion, with the $10σ$ forecast that rescales it, rests on the order in which the average and the power were taken. What a self-consistent MOND cosmology predicts for this observable is a separate question, which the Letter does not address.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alessandro Melchiorri. 2026-10-25. Comment on "Test of the Gravitational Force Law on Cosmological Scales Using the Kinematic Sunyaev--Zeldovich Effect''. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34437

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AGN Reverberation Mapping with LITMUS: Fundamental Limits on lag Recovery Rates

Reverberation mapping of active galactic nuclei provides one of the most direct probes of the geometry and kinematics of the broad-line region by measuring time delays between continuum and line variability. Modern RM surveys frequently suffer difficulties with lag measurements due to poor signal to noise and aliasing, whereby multimodal lag posterior distributions arise due to seasonal gaps in our data. These challenge the reliability of commonly used fitting tools such as JAVELIN, which can return a high rate of false positives. We implement a new lag measurement package, LITMUS, and introduce a new framework that uses Bayesian evidence to identify false positive lag measurements, as well as examine the question of how many AGN present detectable lags in high redshift industrial scale surveys like OzDES and SDSS. Our analysis differs from previous RM studies in six key respects: (i) our inference is robust to the previously under-diagnosed numerical component of aliasing, (ii) we use a consistent methodology for all sources, (iii) uncertainty in the underlying AGN variability is fully marginalised, (iv) lag significance is assessed via Bayesian model comparison rather than heuristic metrics, (v) false-positive rates are quantified by comparison against random-chance recoveries and (vi) we use marginal likelihoods to distinguish between sources where a lag is not detectable in our data and sources that show no evidence of reverberation. Applied to the OzDES sample, we find that previous RM studies are likely to have overestimated the confidence of recovered lags, and we find a stark contrast between a low reverberation percentage for the MgII line (3-28% depending on assumptions) and much higher percentages in the CIV and especially the H$β$ line, which is consistent with 100%. We also present a re-analysed set of lags from the OzDES sample with better quantified reliabilities

astro-ph.CO↗

Limited Impact of CMB B-mode Polarization on Constraints on Cosmic Topology

The global spatial structure of the universe is a fundamental question in cosmology. Although the standard model usually assumes a trivial topology, a multiply connected universe can break statistical isotropy and generate off-diagonal covariance between the spherical-harmonic coefficients of cosmic microwave background fluctuations. In this work, we investigate whether CMB B-mode polarization improves constraints on the cubic three-torus, or $E_1$ topology. We construct the full harmonic-space covariance matrices of the temperature, E-mode, and primordial B-mode anisotropies, including correlations between different $(\ell,m)$ modes, and evaluate Gaussian likelihoods using random realizations generated from a statistically isotropic $Λ$CDM model with trivial topology. To isolate the intrinsic topological information carried by each CMB observable, we consider the ideal cosmic-variance-limited case, neglecting instrumental noise and gravitational lensing. We find that adding primordial B-mode polarization yields only a marginal improvement in the ability to distinguish the $E_1$ topology from the trivial topology, even under these ideal conditions. The different constraining powers of the temperature, E-mode, and B-mode anisotropies can be understood through the combined effects of their transfer-function responses and the topology-induced off-diagonal correlations in harmonic space. }

astro-ph.CO↗

Towards Reliably Measuring the Mass-Size Relation of Dark Matter Halos: Impact of projection, miscentering and Eddington bias

In the conventional spherical overdensity definition of a dark matter halo, masses and radii, e.g. $M_{200{\rm m}}$ and $r_{200{\rm m}}$, are equivalent. However, halos do exhibit a physical boundary at the splashback radius $r_{\rm sp}$, which manifests as a sharp drop in density. Splashback radii are now routinely measured in stacked weak lensing profiles, but the expected trend of decreasing $r_{\rm sp}/r_{200{\rm m}}$ with mass has not been verified in observed galaxy groups or clusters. In this work, we show that several observational effects conceal the predicted mass-size relation. In particular, we quantify the impact of systematics on the mean density and lensing profiles of mock-observed halo samples, which are created by applying a realistic cluster-finding procedure to dark matter-only simulations. We reproduce the known impact of projection: preferentially observing systems in overdense regions. But, differing from previous works, we show that the same projection effect, combined with scatter in observed luminosities, causes a significant Eddington bias in the derived mass-observable relation and a complex suppression in mean density profiles over all radial scales. The magnitude of this effect is mass-dependent and coupled to the cluster-finding procedure and survey properties, making it challenging to model simply and motivating full forward-modeling of observed group and cluster samples. However, we demonstrate that a simple mitigation approach, effectively a weak lensing mass calibration, does well in approximately recovering the true mass-size relation. Finally, we show that only severe miscentering can bias the measurement of the halo size, but any miscentering can increase the measurement uncertainty.

astro-ph.CO↗