arXiv · 2610.34816
Can System-1-Style Decision Models Replace Dedicated Rerankers in RAG? A Systems Evaluation
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems often use a dedicated reranker to choose which retrieved candidates reach the language model. Reranking improves relevance but adds latency, so teams look for faster alternatives. System-1style decision models make direct, structured predictions instead of generating long responses. Could one provide comparable reranking quality with less inference overhead? We first screen 21 open-weight models on 11 benchmarks, then compare a promising decision model with a dedicated reranker on identical candidate lists. The default decision-model setup fails on many long candidate sets, so scoring only the requests it completes gives a misleading ranking. Limiting candidate text length largely restores reliability and makes some configurations competitive. A frozen evaluation on new retrieval data supports the reliability and ranking results, but confirms the latency requirement for only one of the two selected configurations. Across workloads, which model ranks better changes, and a tuned reranker remains faster and uses far less GPU memory. A decision model can perform competitive reranking, but replacing a reranker requires weighing quality, latency and memory together, and teams should tune the reranker they already run first.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Qiaomu Li, Ying Xie. 2026-10-26. Can System-1-Style Decision Models Replace Dedicated Rerankers in RAG? A Systems Evaluation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34816
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.