Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.35155

A curated global dataset of open science initiatives and policies

Abstract

Inventories of open science initiatives differ in scope, geographic coverage and classification, making it difficult to compare infrastructures, services, networks and policies. We developed COSMI Hub within the OPENIT project to bring these sources together in a curated dataset. The release archived on 8 October 2026 contains 1,186 records and 71 variables covering initiative identity, source provenance, geography, record level, operational status, thematic activities, governance, funding and external identifiers. We identified candidates through structured directories, policy documents, official websites and suggestions from the open science community, then checked identities, reconciled duplicates and assessed supporting evidence. The dataset distinguishes standalone initiatives, services, deployments, umbrella organisations and policy instruments. Records can be assigned several thematic dimensions, with uncertainty retained where evidence is incomplete. We describe the collection and coding methods, the data structure and file-level checks, together with considerations for reuse. The Zenodo release is fixed, whereas the companion dashboard is updated separately. Because we assembled the collection purposively, it cannot be used to estimate the worldwide number of open science initiatives.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Abdelghani Maddi, Marc-Andr{é} Simard, Isabelle Dorsch. 2026-10-26. A curated global dataset of open science initiatives and policies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35155

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

VIREL: Route-Local Lattice Residual Compression for Exact and Error-Bounded Floating-Point Time Series

Time-series databases store floating-point columns in independent pages that are written at ingest, rewritten at compaction, and decoded on every scan. Some columns must return the stored IEEE 754 word; others accept a pointwise bound $\varepsilon$. Codecs for both contracts turn each value into an integer on a lattice, but a real page mixes decimal resolutions. Keeping one scale per block charges every coarse step for the finest value: one scale-6 reading in a 1,024-value page cuts Falcon's compression ratio by 36%. We present VIREL, route-local lattice residual compression. A value enters a lattice only after the encoder has replayed the decoder's arithmetic on it. VIREL-Exact replays the decoder's division at each value's least decimal scale, which we prove always succeeds below $2^{51}$, gives every resolution its own lane and history, and places averages on a rational lattice; the same finer value costs it 0.6%. VIREL-EB replays a fused multiply-add on an error lattice, so every admitted value decodes within $\varepsilon$. One integer coder serves both contracts. On 14 canonical streams, VIREL-Exact emits 27.6% fewer bytes than Falcon. Fast beats ALP on ratio and both speeds at once: 7.01$\times$ against 4.19$\times$, 476 against 120 MB/s, and 5.0 against 4.5 GB/s on one core. Upper is the smallest output on all 48 larger streams. Ingest with Fast and compaction with Upper store those streams in Apache TsFile at 48.7% of ALP's bytes. VIREL-EB beats Machete on ratio and both speeds in all 90 dataset-bound cells.

cs.DB↗

ACTIVE: A Dynamic Pareto-Frontier-Based Unified Index for Dual-Vector Query

Existing approximate nearest neighbor search (ANNS) methods generally assume that each entity has a single vector. In many real-world applications, however, an entity is associated with more than one vector, and queries may jointly consider two attributes. With different queries assigning different weights to each attribute, Pareto-frontier-based indices provide an effective solution for dual-vector retrieval by connecting to approximate nearest neighbors under all possible query preferences. However, existing Pareto-frontier-based approaches suffer from substantial inefficiencies in both index construction and dynamic updates, limiting their practical applicability. To address these issues, we propose ACTIVE, a dynamic Pareto-frontier-based DVQ index that supports efficient construction and updates while maintaining high retrieval performance under varying query preferences. It employs angle-constrained active-range computation and connectivity-loss-driven adaptive repair strategies to accelerate node insertion and deletion, respectively. Extensive experiments show that, at comparable (or slightly below) search accuracy, ACTIVE improves insertion throughput by $1.20$--$1.43\times$ over DEG, and deletion throughput by $1.64$--$2.06\times$ over neighbor-reconnection-based repair and by $22.64$--$39.51\times$ over reinsertion-based repair.

cs.DB↗

Automated Standardization of Legacy Biomedical Metadata Using an Ontology-Constrained LLM Agent

Descriptive scientific metadata in public repositories are often incomplete and inconsistent with community standards and ontologies, limiting data FAIRness. Large language models (LLM) offer a promising approach to automatically standardizing such metadata when the LLM is provided with knowledge of the relevant standards in machine-actionable form. Entry of metadata standards through prompt engineering offers only fixed snapshots of the relevant standards, however, and it relies on an LLM's pretrained knowledge to interpret and satisfy constraints related to the standard. We evaluate whether giving an LLM access to metadata specifications and authoritative terminology at runtime improves automated metadata standardization. We present ARMS, a tool-using LLM agent that retrieves complete CEDAR metadata templates and that queries authoritative biomedical terminology services dynamically at execution time. We compared ARMS with a prompt-engineering approach on 839 legacy metadata records describing experiment datasets with expert-standardized records serving as the reference standard. Across the corpus, ARMS outperformed the prompt-engineering approach in converting legacy metadata to standards-compliant form, increasing precision from 0.56 to 0.93 and recall from 0.51 to 0.85, with improvements across all field categories and assay types. The largest gains occurred for ontology-constrained fields where precision increased from 0.36 to 0.92. Our findings show that access to appropriate metadata standards can substantially improve LLM-based standardization of legacy metadata. ARMS improves metadata standardization by giving LLMs runtime access to the authoritative resources that define valid metadata. Representation of metadata standards in machine-actionable form enhances the task of rectifying legacy metadata using LLM technology, especially when those standards can be queried dynamically.

cs.DB↗