Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.35499

Beyond "[at]": A Large-Scale Measurement of Email Address Presentation on Computer Science Scholars' Homepages

Abstract

Publishing an email address makes a scholar reachable, but also exposes it to automated collection. Yet how email addresses are presented on the Web has not been measured systematically across their content, form, and location. We measure it across 32,413 homepage records of computer-science scholars listed in CSRankings with MailScope, which preserves raw and rendered HTML, extracts addresses with a three-stage cascade (rules, then large language models, then a crawling agent), and labels each address. Among 19,517 reachable homepages, we find an address for 17,712 scholars (90.8%). Our measurement yields four main findings. (i) Presentation is diverse: only 53.8% publish plain content, the others spread over 23 subtypes of symbol substitution, code, and semantic description, and 5.5% of scholars' addresses appear only after rendering. (ii) Presentation follows hosts rather than individuals: scholars on one host share a content class in 67.9% of pairs, compared with 38.8% across hosts of one institution, whereas research output and institution rank are barely related to presentation. (iii) Content and form are coupled through code-based links, and 6.2% of scholars with non-plain selected presentations have plain-text copies of the same address elsewhere. (iv) Plain addresses are more common behind passed bot challenges, and 36.1% of redirecting homepages no longer lead to scholars. Human assessment yields 94.4% weighted exact-set agreement on 143 judgeable pages, complemented by three 500-page review rounds with human verification. Presentation is diverse but clusters by shared host, and by our label-based estimate plain-string matching misses nearly half of the addresses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aichun Huang, Xiang Li, Zheli Liu. 2026-10-26. Beyond "[at]": A Large-Scale Measurement of Email Address Presentation on Computer Science Scholars' Homepages. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35499

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

An Interpretable CF-RL-TOPSIS Fusion Model for Skills-Aware Talent Recommendation

Effective skills-aware talent recommendation must balance behavioral transition patterns, trajectory-sensitive adaptation, and inspectable occupation-level criteria. Evidence from public benchmarks on how these signals interact, however, remains limited. This study proposes CF-RL-TOPSIS, an interpretable late-fusion model that integrates a transition-aware collaborative branch, a compact reinforcement-style occupation-family bandit, and an entropy-weighted TOPSIS branch constructed from six semantic proxies; the validation-selected fusion coefficients remain auditable. The model is evaluated on two frozen public ICT talent-history benchmarks, JobHop and Karrierewege, using repeated chronological top-5 ranking and paired Wilcoxon tests. On JobHop the full hybrid attains NDCG@5 = 0.3040 +/- 0.0073 and significantly surpasses repeat-last, item Markov, transition-aware collaborative filtering, the CF+TOPSIS hybrid, GRU4Rec, and SASRec (p <= 0.0039 across planned comparisons). On Karrierewege the hybrid remains competitive but does not significantly exceed the strongest Markov baseline, revealing a persistence-dominated setting in which the bandit branch appropriately shrinks to near-zero weight. Proxy-sensitivity, family-level deep Q-network, and runtime checks support this interpretation, and a worked user-level case shows how branch scores, criterion weights, and rank shifts can be inspected for an individual recommendation. The contribution is not a benchmark-agnostic superiority claim, but a reproducible account of the conditions under which transparent late fusion adds value beyond simple continuation heuristics. In semantically rich, non-saturating talent-history regimes the three branches reinforce one another; in persistence-dominated regimes the same architecture remains competitive through its collaborative backbone, with the adaptive branch correctly inactive.

cs.IR↗

UniRec: Cross-stage Multi-Task Fusion with Preference Optimization for Cascaded Recommender Systems

Industrial recommender systems use cascaded stages with different candidate spaces, data distributions, and latency constraints. Each stage include multi-objective prediction and multi-task fusion (MTF) modules. Existing MTF methods typically design and optimize the fusion module independently for each stage, which can lead to inconsistent preferences across stages. Although cross-stage coordination methods have been proposed, they mainly transfer supervision to upstream scoring models rather than jointly optimizing the fusion modules. We propose UniRec, a Unified Cross-stage Recommendation Fusion framework that jointly optimizes pre-ranking and ranking fusion agents. UniRec employs a coupled dual-agent architecture with partially shared embeddings and stage-specific fusion functions. It further introduces Dual-Axis Preference Optimization to combine stage-local preferences with downstream-to-upstream preference transfer. To enable stable and efficient cross-stage training, we address two practical challenges: reward-induced distribution drift and the computational cost of pairwise preference learning. Extensive offline and online experiments on a production short-video system demonstrate consistent gains over single-stage fusion and cross-stage coordination baselines. In a nine-week online A/B test, UniRec improves total watch time by $0.675\%$ and app usage time by $0.616\%$, and active users by $0.189\%$, and has been fully deployed in production.

cs.IR↗

Geometric Gain Graph: Zero-Token Graph Construction for Multi-Hop RAG

Existing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems struggle with multi-hop reasoning due to a fundamental inability to balance relevance and novelty. Traditional dense retrievers are constrained by surface-level matching, falling into a homogenized "Similarity Trap". Conversely, emerging Graph RAGs attempt to explore novel documents via heuristic entity extraction, but they introduce prohibitive Large Language Model (LLM) overhead and easily drift into off-topic "Novelty Traps". To fundamentally resolve this contradiction, we propose Geometric Gain Graph (G$^3$RAG), the novel zero-token graph construction paradigm for RAG. G$^3$RAG completely discards the expensive heuristic extraction by LLMs, aiming instead to directly quantify the information gain between nodes through the native document feature space. To this end, we designed a concise edge weight criterion, $\cosθ\cdot \sinθ$, which naturally maps the trade-off between relevance and novelty into a geometric measurement of directional consistency and orthogonality in the vector space, thereby driving the token-free topological construction of the graph. Furthermore, we introduce a topological penalty to suppress the excessive connectivity of high-frequency hubs, forcing the transient diffusion process toward long-tail peripheral nodes that carry critical indirect evidence. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, while entirely eliminating LLM token costs during graph construction, G$^3$RAG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art Graph RAG baselines on complex multi-hop QA benchmarks. The code is available at: https://github.com/deeplearning-LI/G3RAG

cs.IR↗