Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.36051

ECH0EZ: Estimating the Hubble constant with ZTF SN Ia DR2

Abstract

Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are instrumental for a precise measurement of the Hubble constant ($H_0$) from the local distance ladder, yet the data used hitherto for this purpose are inhomogeneous and subject to severe selection effects. We present the first, preliminary, cosmological analysis of 772 SNe Ia from the Zwicky Transient Facility's second data release: an untargeted single-telescope sample whose volume-limited subset (z<0.06) is largely free of Malmquist bias. We correct the public data for known instrumental and calibration biases and the redshifts for peculiar motions. Using the 42 SH0ES calibrators (their host distances computed from Cepheids and geometric anchors) and a Bayesian hierarchical model of SN Ia standardisation, dust extinction, redshift and calibration uncertainties, we infer $H_0 = (71.6 \pm 1.5)$ km/s/Mpc after marginalising over deceleration with a flat prior (or $(72.3 \pm 1.1)$ km/s/Mpc if a prior on matter density from Pantheon+ is imposed), with the uncertainty dominated by the number of calibrators. We demonstrate robustness to the choice of light-curve and Milky Way dust models and to extensions of the model to include peculiar-velocity correlations, a host-mass step, and two stretch populations. These results are in agreement with previous distance-ladder measurements and $2.7σ$ ($4.1σ$) away from the value obtained from Planck data, suggesting that the resolution of the Hubble tension lies outside of SNe Ia---or the distance ladder entirely.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Konstantin Karchev, Marco Giunta, Raul Jimenez, Roberto Trotta, Licia Verde. 2026-10-26. ECH0EZ: Estimating the Hubble constant with ZTF SN Ia DR2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Towards Reliably Measuring the Mass-Size Relation of Dark Matter Halos: Impact of projection, miscentering and Eddington bias

In the conventional spherical overdensity definition of a dark matter halo, masses and radii, e.g. $M_{200{\rm m}}$ and $r_{200{\rm m}}$, are equivalent. However, halos do exhibit a physical boundary at the splashback radius $r_{\rm sp}$, which manifests as a sharp drop in density. Splashback radii are now routinely measured in stacked weak lensing profiles, but the expected trend of decreasing $r_{\rm sp}/r_{200{\rm m}}$ with mass has not been verified in observed galaxy groups or clusters. In this work, we show that several observational effects conceal the predicted mass-size relation. In particular, we quantify the impact of systematics on the mean density and lensing profiles of mock-observed halo samples, which are created by applying a realistic cluster-finding procedure to dark matter-only simulations. We reproduce the known impact of projection: preferentially observing systems in overdense regions. But, differing from previous works, we show that the same projection effect, combined with scatter in observed luminosities, causes a significant Eddington bias in the derived mass-observable relation and a complex suppression in mean density profiles over all radial scales. The magnitude of this effect is mass-dependent and coupled to the cluster-finding procedure and survey properties, making it challenging to model simply and motivating full forward-modeling of observed group and cluster samples. However, we demonstrate that a simple mitigation approach, effectively a weak lensing mass calibration, does well in approximately recovering the true mass-size relation. Finally, we show that only severe miscentering can bias the measurement of the halo size, but any miscentering can increase the measurement uncertainty.

astro-ph.CO↗

Warm inflation beyond the Gaussian limit: primordial black holes and induced gravitational waves

In warm inflation, the primordial fluctuations are driven by random kicks from a hot radiation bath. Two features of these kicks matter: how long the bath remembers them, which shapes the power spectrum, and how their strengths are spread, which controls the rare, extreme fluctuations. In this paper, we investigate how primordial black holes and the accompanying induced gravitational waves can be used to discriminate between these two features. We use a simple model inspired by warm inflation, in which independent kicks of random strength add up to a narrow peak in the power spectrum. At leading order, the induced gravitational wave depends only on the power spectrum and is therefore insensitive to how the kicks are distributed. However, the black holes are very sensitive to these rare large fluctuations. Hence, two baths can yield the same gravitational wave signal while forming black holes at very different rates. A modest kurtosis range of 0.1 to 0.3 enhances black-hole formation by factors of ten to a million at fixed gravitational-wave amplitude, the larger factors for the rarer black holes. Counting peaks rather than all points, or widening the spectrum, lowers the enhancement by at most a factor of about four. In general a change in the power affects both phenomena, while the kurtosis affects only the black hole production.

astro-ph.CO↗

Extracting intrinsic alignments in the Dark Energy Survey's year 1 data, using the self-calibration method and LSST-DESC tools

We present the implementation of a Self-Calibration of Intrinsic Alignments of galaxies as an extension to the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC)'s weak lensing 3x2pt pipeline (TXPipe). As a demonstration, we have run this pipeline on the Dark Energy Survey (DES) year one data set. We find indications of a non-zero intrinsic alignment signal in the higher redshift bins, while in the lower bins our results look more uncertain. We believe this is caused by known issues with the individual galaxies photo-z estimation. This effect is particularly harmful for the self-calibration method, since it has high requirements for reliable estimation of the photo-$z$s, and the need for individual galaxy point estimates and tomographic binning to match. We show how different methods of recreating the redshift probability distribution can affect the detection of intrinsic alignment.

astro-ph.CO↗