Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.36238

An approximate inner ball condition characterizing $C^{1,α}$ convex bodies

Abstract

The main result of this paper uses an approximate inner ball condition to characterize $C^{1,α}$ convex bodies for $0<α\leq 1$. In particular, we show that a convex body $K$ is of class $C^{1,α}$ if and only if there exist constants $C,\varepsilon_0>0$ such that for every $0<\varepsilon\leq\varepsilon_0$ and for every $x\in\partial K$ there exists $h^\varepsilon(x)$ satisfying $B(h^\varepsilon(x), C\varepsilon^\frac{1-α}{1+α})\subset K$ and $\operatorname{dist}(x,B(h^\varepsilon(x), C\varepsilon^\frac{1-α}{1+α}))\leq\varepsilon.$ We then give a new proof of the regularity of the convex envelope by showing that $\operatorname{conv}(f)\in C^{1,α}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ whenever $f\in C^{1,α}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ and $f$ satisfies the coercivity condition $f(x)\to\infty$ as $|x|\to\infty$. Finally, we use the approximate inner ball characterization of $C^{1,α}$ convex bodies to prove that the Minkowski sum of a $C^{1,α}$ convex body and a nonempty closed convex set is a $C^{1,α}$ convex domain.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anthony R. Cappello. 2026-10-26. An approximate inner ball condition characterizing $C^{1,α}$ convex bodies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36238

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Non-separable arrangements of convex bodies revisited

A problem posed by Erdős in 1945 initiated the study of non-separable arrangements of convex bodies. A finite collection of convex bodies in Euclidean $d$-space is called a non-separable family (or NS-family) if every hyperplane intersecting their convex hull also intersects at least one member of the family. Recent work has focused on minimal coverings of NS-families consisting of positive homothetic convex bodies. In this paper, we strengthen these results by establishing their stability analogues and analyze weakly non-separable families of convex polytopes. We also examine weakly $k$-impassable families of convex $d$-polytopes for $0<k<d-1$ and study tightness of NS-lattice arrangements.

math.MG↗

Hyperbolicity Beyond Convexity in the Alexandrov-Fenchel Inequality

We establish an Alexandrov--Fenchel type inequality in which one of the reference bodies is replaced by a function whose Hessian satisfies a balancing condition on its eigenvalues, without being required to be positive semidefinite. The proof hinges on a new extension of Alexandrov's inequality for mixed discriminants. As applications, we derive a log-concavity principle for linear functionals of area measures, answering a question of Colesanti, Hug, and Saorín-Gómez, as well as Brunn--Minkowski type inequalities for intrinsic volumes of mean section bodies, answering a question of Schuster.

math.MG↗

Approximating the Euclidean Ball by Polytopes: Surprising Rates in High Dimensions

We determine the sharp dimensional dependence of the asymptotic approximation error for the Euclidean unit ball $B_2^d\subset\mathbb{R}^d$ by polytopes with a prescribed number of vertices in the relative symmetric difference metric. Specifically, we prove that $$\lim_{N\to\infty}N^{2/(d-1)}\inf_{P\in P_d(N)}\frac{\operatorname{vol}_d(P\triangle B_2^d)}{\operatorname{vol}_d(B_2^d)}=Θ(d^{-1/2}),$$ where $P_d(N)$ consists of polytopes with at most $N$ vertices and no containment restriction. Equivalently, the classical Laguerre-Delone triangulation numbers satisfy $\operatorname{ldel}_{d-1}=Θ(d^{-1/2})$. This improves the lower bound $Ω(d^{-1})$ of Böröczky (2000) and the upper bound $O(1)$ of Ludwig, Schütt and Werner (2006). In contrast, the corresponding asymptotic coefficient for approximation with a prescribed number of facets has order one, as shown by Kur (2020). We also establish non-asymptotic bounds showing that, for every fixed $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$, the ball admits an $\varepsilon$-approximation with at most $\exp(C(\varepsilon)\sqrt d)$ vertices, whereas approximating the hypercube to the same accuracy requires at least $\exp(c(\varepsilon)d)$ vertices. Consequently, the ball does not maximize the optimal relative approximation error among convex bodies, even up to an absolute multiplicative constant at the same vertex budget. Thus Macbeath's theorem (1951) on the extremality of the ball for inscribed approximation does not extend to polytopes in arbitrary position.

math.MG↗