Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.36654

Edhivo: An AI-Native Platform for Scalable Assessment and Instant Feedback in Higher Education

Abstract

Scaling assessment in higher education faces two intertwined bottlenecks: the cognitive burden of authoring assessments and the inability to semantically evaluate open-ended responses, which together create a persistent feedback gap that hinders student learning outcomes. To address these challenges, we present Edhivo, an AI-native pedagogical platform that addresses both bottlenecks through a vertically integrated system for content delivery, assessment, and reporting. Edhivo employs a Dual-LLM pipeline: one model generates context-aware assessments for both multiple-choice and open-ended questions, from instructor-provided materials, while a second model performs multi-criteria, rubric-based evaluation of student responses, enabling near-instant qualitative feedback at multiple hierarchical levels. All AI interactions are source-grounded to reduce hallucination risk, and a Human-in-the-Loop review process preserves instructor authority. We demonstrate Edhivo's efficacy through a pilot deployment at Stony Brook University in a real classroom environment in 2026 spring, where it supports high-frequency assessment creation and evaluation for a cohort of 36 students throughout a full semester, significantly reducing authoring effort and feedback latency while enabling novel pedagogical designs centered on active learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Moraish Kapoor, Jiawei Zhou. 2026-10-27. Edhivo: An AI-Native Platform for Scalable Assessment and Instant Feedback in Higher Education. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36654

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence in the C-Suite: The Role of the Chief AI Officer

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into corporate strategy has become critical for organizations seeking to maintain competitive advantage in the digital age. Although organizations increasingly rely on AI as a strategic and organizational resource, existing C-suite roles remain only partially equipped to govern, integrate, and leverage it coherently at the enterprise level. Organizations vary in their responses. Some create a dedicated Chief AI Officer (CAIO), others extend existing mandates into hybrid roles, and still others coordinate AI through federated structures. This paper develops a role-design theory to explain this variation. I identify three properties that distinguish AI systems from earlier cross-cutting enterprise technologies, distributed accountability for judgment, upstream governance, and non-stationarity, and three configurations through which organizations respond: concentrated extension, distributed extension, and role creation. Four propositions specify when a dedicated CAIO emerges, what form an organization's response takes, when the role is effective, and how configurations evolve. Drawing on the first archival census of executive AI leadership, I find that the role has diffused sharply since 2023, that role creation and mandate extension are advancing in near parity, that adoption concentrates where digital leadership structures already exist, and that executive tenures contradict practitioner accounts of a transient role. The paper contributes to research on executive leadership, AI governance, and the design of AI-driven organizations.

cs.CY↗

ReasonX: Declarative Reasoning on Explanations

Explaining opaque Machine Learning (ML) models has become an increasingly important challenge. However, current eXplanation in AI (XAI) methods suffer several shortcomings, including insufficient abstraction, limited user interactivity, and inadequate integration of symbolic knowledge. We propose ReasonX, an explanation tool based on expressions (or, queries) in a closed algebra of operators over theories of linear constraints. ReasonX provides declarative and interactive explanations for decision trees, which may represent the ML models under analysis or serve as global or local surrogate models for tabular-data black-box classifiers. Users can express background or common sense knowledge as linear constraints. This allows for reasoning at multiple levels of abstraction, ranging from fully specified examples to under-specified or partially constrained ones. ReasonX leverages Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) to reason over the features of factual and contrastive instances. We present here the architecture of ReasonX, which consists of a Python layer, closer to the user, and a Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) layer, which implements a meta-interpreter of the query algebra. The capabilities of ReasonX are demonstrated through qualitative examples, and compared to other XAI tools through quantitative experiments.

cs.CY↗

No Certificate, No Categorical Speech Act: A Brouwerian Assertibility Constraint for Public Reason

Generative AI can convert uncertainty into authoritative-seeming verdicts, displacing the justificatory work on which democratic epistemic agency depends. As a corrective, I propose a Brouwer-inspired assertibility constraint for responsible AI: in high-stakes domains, systems may assert or deny claims only if they can provide a publicly inspectable and contestable certificate of entitlement; otherwise they must return Undetermined. This constraint yields a three-status interface semantics (Asserted, Denied, Undetermined) whose statuses mark entitlement to categorical speech rather than truth values of the underlying world-claim. The framework distinguishes internal entitlement from public standing while connecting them through the certificate as a boundary object. Philosophically, it develops a form of applied intuitionism: resistance to unwarranted completeness becomes a norm of public machine speech, under which categorical commitment requires exhibited and contestable entitlement. I operationalize the constraint through structured certificates, decision-layer gates for threshold and argmax predicates, and a reason-coded output contract. A design lemma shows that, under a refutation-soundness condition on the contractually specified negative side, certificate-sound binary totality presupposes witnessed decidability on the declared scope. Under the proposed normative output contract, Undetermined is not a tunable reject option but a mandatory status whenever the available certificates do not uniquely license assertion or denial. By making outputs answerable to contestable warrants rather than confidence alone, the paper aims to preserve epistemic agency where automated speech enters public justification.

cs.CY↗