Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.37406

CTBakeGS: training-free baking of photorealistic CT volume renderings into 3D Gaussian splats

Abstract

Photorealistic volume rendering of computed tomography (CT) may convey anatomy intuitively, but it needs the CT data, dedicated software and a powerful graphics processor. Three-dimensional Gaussian splatting (3DGS) displays photorealistic scenes in real time on less powerful devices, but existing medical approaches train each scene for minutes to hours. We aimed to convert a CT volume rendering directly into a 3DGS model without training. Splats were placed on an adaptive octree of millimetre-sized cells. Their colour and opacity were computed on the graphics processor with the renderer's lighting, cell opacity was converted analytically into splat opacity, and faint splats were retained stochastically above the 1/255 opacity floor of standard 3DGS rasterisers. Six public CT scans (1.5-mm voxels) were converted with three transfer functions and compared with converged references by peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity and a learned perceptual metric. Two-million-splat models reached a PSNR of 32.6 +/- 0.9 dB for bone, 30.1 +/- 1.0 dB for contrast-enhanced vessels and 32.3 +/- 1.5 dB for skin and bone. A conversion pass (usually two or three per model) took 4-30 s on a current laptop and 9-60 s on a desktop with a 4-GB graphics card. On the laptop, the models rendered at 68 frames per second at 800 x 800 pixels. Training-free conversion produced real-time 3DGS models of photorealistic CT renderings in about a minute or less per conversion pass on ordinary computers, with fidelity that we consider sufficient for interactive viewing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Haruki Fukuda, Constantin Lux, Wolf Schweitzer, Tadashi Hosoya, Lars Ebert. 2026-10-27. CTBakeGS: training-free baking of photorealistic CT volume renderings into 3D Gaussian splats. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37406

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

DyRA: Portable Dynamic Resolution Adjustment Network for Existing Detectors

Achieving constant accuracy in object detection is challenging due to the inherent variability of object sizes. One effective approach to this problem involves optimizing input resolution, referred to as a multi-resolution strategy. Previous approaches to resolution optimization have often been based on pre-defined resolutions with manual selection. However, there is a lack of study on run-time resolution optimization for existing architectures. This paper introduces DyRA, a dynamic resolution adjustment network providing an image-specific scale factor for existing detectors. This network is co-trained with detectors utilizing specially designed loss functions, namely ParetoScaleLoss and BalanceLoss. ParetoScaleLoss determines an adaptive scale factor for robustness, while BalanceLoss optimizes overall scale factors according to the localization performance of the detector. The loss function is devised to minimize the accuracy drop across contrasting objectives of different-sized objects for scaling. Our proposed network can improve accuracy across various models, including RetinaNet, Faster-RCNN, FCOS, DINO, and H-Deformable-DETR. The code is available at https://github.com/DaEunFullGrace/DyRA.git.

cs.CV↗

Smart Surveillance: Deep Learning and Hybrid Approaches for Dynamic Scene Analysis, Object Detection and Motion Tracking

Event-triggered recording reduces the footage a surveillance camera must store, but the trigger decides how much idle video is kept, how many events are missed, and how much computation is spent. We compare six motion triggers (frame differencing, dense optical flow, MOG2, KNN, CNT, GSOC), a CNN detector, strided detection, and three motion-gated hybrids under one recording policy, on a benchmark of seven static-camera scenes (5,800 frames, 27 annotated events) with thresholds transferred to unseen scenes by leave-one-video-out. Detector-based triggers stored 19-28% of idle frames, against 36-89% for motion triggers. Under simulated camera jitter, frame differencing, optical flow, MOG2 and KNN stored 97-100% of idle frames, while detector triggers stayed below 29%. Running the detector on every 8th frame kept 99.7% of event frames at 9.8 ms of CPU per frame, cheaper and more robust than gating it with background subtraction. On VisDrone, raising YOLO11n's input from 640 to 1280 px raised AP from 15.5 to 26.8, more than a larger model, and INT8 quantization cut latency by 17% for 0.3 AP. In tracking, longer track memory raised IDF1 from 70.5 to 76.7, but every tracker recovered only 39-44% of overlapped people, because detection rather than association failed.

cs.CV↗

An Embarrassingly Simple Data Selection Strategy for Million-Scale Multi-Modal Instruction-Tuning

Recent research demonstrates that pretrained large language models (LLMs) require minimal but carefully curated data for instruction-tuning. Building on LLMs, multi-modal models further contend with far larger data volumes, heterogeneous sources, and cross-modal alignment, amplifying both the necessity and the complexity of data selection. However, existing methods rely on deeply extracted embeddings, gradients or narrow quality scores that are time-consuming to compute and limited in expressiveness, frequently failing to surpass a simple random-sampling baseline. To overcome these limitations, we step back from complex embedding spaces and target the fundamental objective of instruction tuning: how and what knowledge should be elicited from the pretrained model and exposed to users. We leverage interaction \underline{S}tyles as a proxy for structural diversity, and decompose data quality into capability-specific \underline{S}cores, yielding an explicit yet \underline{R}ich (SSR) profile for each sample. We further cast the selection as submodular coverage maximization over the capability--style grid, providing an approximation guarantee. SSR consistently delivers superior performance across two distinct architecture stacks, LLaVA-1.5 (Vicuna + CLIP) and LLaVA-OneVision (Qwen2 + SigLIP), two large-scale data pools, six data budget settings, and 14 multi-modal benchmarks. To our knowledge, SSR is the first data selection method validated at million-scale, achieving 99.1% of full-data performance using only 30% of a 2.6M pool. Furthermore, the SSR profile models and selected subsets transfer training-free across data pools and model architectures with capability extensibility.

cs.CV↗