Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.37634

UPP$^{\text{cc}}$ is Not Closed Under Intersection

Abstract

The sign rank of a ${\pm 1}$-valued matrix $A$ is the minimum rank of a real matrix that agrees with $A$ entrywise in sign. For every sufficiently large $d$, we give an explicit matrix $A$ with $2^{Θ(d^2)}$ rows and columns and sign rank $Θ(d)$ such that $A \land A$ has sign rank $2^{Θ(d)}$. Here, $A \land A$ is the communication matrix of the problem obtained by evaluating $A$ on disjoint inputs and taking the conjunction of the results. As the logarithm of sign rank characterizes unbounded-error communication complexity, this implies that the communication class $\mathsf{UPP}^{\mathsf{cc}}$ is not closed under intersection. The starting point for our lower bound is Forster's method, which relates the sign rank of a matrix to the average margin of representations of its rows and columns by points and halfspaces. We study a continuous analog for conjunctions of inner-product sign tests on the unit sphere. Rotational symmetry connects this problem to polynomial sign representations, yielding an exponentially small upper bound on the average margin. This bound holds even when sign constraints are relaxed near the sign tests' decision boundary, allowing us to transfer it to explicit finite sign matrices arising from intersections of integer halfspaces.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark Bun, Mandar Juvekar. 2026-10-27. UPP$^{\text{cc}}$ is Not Closed Under Intersection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37634

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost-Polynomial Ratio Almost-ETH-Hardness of Approximating Densest $k$-Subgraph

In the Densest $k$-Subgraph problem, given an undirected graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the goal is to find a subgraph of $G$ on $k$ vertices that contains maximum number of edges. Even though the state-of-the-art algorithm for the problem achieves only $O(n^{1/4 + \varepsilon})$ approximation ratio (Bhaskara et al., 2010), previous attempts at proving hardness of approximation, including those under average case assumptions, fail to achieve a polynomial ratio; the best ratios ruled out under any worst case assumption and any average case assumption are only any constant (Raghavendra and Steurer, 2010) and $2^{Ω(\log^{2/3} n)}$ (Alon et al., 2011) respectively. In this work, we propose the Almost-Exponential Time Hypothesis (Almost-ETH), which postulates that no algorithm can solve 3SAT on $n$ variables in $O(2^{n^{1 - γ}})$ time for any constant $γ> 0$. Assuming Almost-ETH, we show that, for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, there is no polynomial-time algorithm that approximates {\sc D$k$S} to within $2^{(\log n)^{1 - \varepsilon}}$ factor of the optimum. In addition, our result has perfect completeness, meaning that, assuming Almost-ETH, no polynomial-time algorithm can even distinguish between the case in which $G$ contains a $k$-clique and the case in which every induced $k$-subgraph of $G$ has density at most $2^{-(\log n)^{1 - \varepsilon}}$.

cs.CC↗

Optimal Inapproximability of Satisfiable $k$-LIN over Non-Abelian Groups

A seminal result of Håstad [J. ACM, 48(4):798--859, 2001] shows that it is NP-hard to find an assignment that satisfies $\frac{1}{|G|}+\varepsilon$ fraction of the constraints of a given $k$-LIN instance over an abelian group, even if there is an assignment that satisfies $(1-\varepsilon)$ fraction of the constraints, for any constant $\varepsilon>0$. Engebretsen et al. [Theoretical Computer Science, 312(1):17--45, 2004] later showed that the same hardness result holds for $k$-LIN instances over any finite non-abelian group. Unlike the abelian case, where we can efficiently find a solution if the instance is satisfiable, in the non-abelian case, it is NP-complete to decide if a given system of linear equations is satisfiable or not, as shown by Goldmann and Russell [Information and Computation, 178(1):253--262. 2002]. Surprisingly, for certain non-abelian groups $G$, given a satisfiable $k$-LIN instance over $G$, one can in fact do better than just outputting a random assignment using a simple but clever algorithm. The approximation factor achieved by this algorithm varies with the underlying group. In this paper, we show that this algorithm is {\em optimal} by proving a tight hardness of approximation of satisfiable $k$-LIN instance over {\em any} non-abelian $G$, assuming $P \neq NP$. As a corollary, we also get $3$-query probabilistically checkable proofs with perfect completeness over large alphabets with improved soundness. Our proof crucially uses structural properties captured by Gowers' notion of {\em quasi-randomness} for non-abelian groups [Combinatorics, Probability and Computing, 17(3):363--387, 2008].

cs.CC↗

Polynomial and Hyperplane Avoidance over the Integers with Applications to Integer-Point Counting

We study the \emph{Polynomial Avoidance Problem}: given a finite collection $F \subseteq Z[x_1,\dots,x_n]$ of nonzero polynomials, find a vector $x \in Z^n$ of minimum $\ell_p$-norm such that $f(x)\neq0$ for every $f \in F$. Each polynomial is given sparsely as a list of its nonzero terms. The affine special case is the \emph{Hyperplane Avoidance Problem}. This special case arises in Barvinok-type algorithms for counting integer points in polyhedra, when certain rational generating functions must be evaluated at a removable singularity. Our main results are as follows: 1) Let $D:=\sum_{f\in F} \text{deg} f$. Every instance admits a feasible vector $x$ satisfying \[ \|x\|_1 \leq \min\left\{D,\frac{D+n}{2}\right\}. \] This bound is tight. Such a vector can be found by a deterministic algorithm whose bit complexity is polynomial in $D$ and the sparse encoding length of the input. Our proof uses a new algorithmic variant of the \emph{Combinatorial Nullstellensatz}; 2) In the affine case, with $m$ input polynomials, such a vector can be constructed by a fast deterministic polynomial-time algorithm using $O(nm)$ arithmetic operations. For the homogeneous case, Barvinok's original approach provides only the weaker guarantee $\|x\|_1 = O((nm)^{n-1})$; 3) The problem is NP-hard for every $p\in R_{\geq 1}\cup\{\infty\}$, even for homogeneous linear forms; 4) As an application, we improve the complexity bound for counting integer points in general rational polytopes. We also improve the bound for polyhedra of bounded codimension; this includes the counting version of the \emph{Unbounded Subset-Sum} problem as a special case.

cs.CC↗