Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.38325

Compartment-driven Gaussian processes for uncertainty quantification of pharmacokinetic exposures

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic modeling is a crucial part of drug development. An important goal is to estimate patients' total and peak exposure to a drug over time, quantified by the area under the concentration--time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration ($C_{\max}$) respectively. Such exposure assessment is essential to balance efficacy and safety in medications that offer therapeutic benefits but carry risks of toxicity, such as chemotherapy drugs. Uncertainty quantification for exposure quantities, however, remains challenging, since they are functionals of an often sparsely observed concentration--time curve with measurement errors. We propose a compartment-driven Gaussian process framework that propagates uncertainty in concentration--time curves to pharmacokinetic exposure functionals. Our approach uses pharmacokinetic compartmental models to specify a mechanistically informed prior and Gaussian processes to accommodate departures from the assumed pharmacokinetic dynamics. The framework can accommodate both individual-level and group-aggregated concentration--time data commonly seen in practice. We provide straightforward computational procedures for drawing posterior inference on AUC and $C_{\max}$. Simulations across a range of observation schemes demonstrate robustness to departures from the assumed compartmental dynamics. We apply the method to patient-level datasets on warfarin and theophylline, and aggregated data from a chemotherapy study of 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine in patients with normal or impaired hepatic function. The chemotherapy analysis quantifies drug-specific exposure differences between groups with differing liver function, with potential implications for informing dosing decisions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sanjay Palta-Hill, Barbara Engelhardt, Edric Tam. 2026-10-28. Compartment-driven Gaussian processes for uncertainty quantification of pharmacokinetic exposures. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38325

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Real-time Win Probability and Latent Player Ability via STATS X in Team Sports

This study proposes a statistically grounded framework for real-time win probability evaluation and player assessment in score-based team sports, based on minute-by-minute cumulative box-score data. We introduce a continuous dominance indicator (T-score) that maps final scores to real values consistent with win/lose outcomes, and formulate it as a time-evolving stochastic representation (T-process) driven by standardized cumulative statistics. This structure captures temporal game dynamics and enables sequential, analytically tractable updates of in-game win probability. Through this stochastic formulation, competitive advantage is decomposed into interpretable statistical components. Furthermore, we define a latent contribution index, STATS X, which quantifies a player's involvement in favorable dominance intervals identified by the T-process. This allows us to separate a team's baseline strength from game-specific performance fluctuations and provides a coherent, structural evaluation framework for both teams and players. While we do not implement AI methods in this paper, our framework is positioned as a foundational step toward hybrid integration with AI. By providing a structured time-series representation of dominance with an explicit probabilistic interpretation, the framework enables flexible learning mechanisms and incorporation of high-dimensional data, while preserving statistical coherence and interpretability. This work provides a basis for advancing AI-driven sports analytics.

stat.AP↗

Critique of "Use of roster charts in the investigation and prosecution of nurses ..." by John O' Quigley

The paper "Use of roster charts in the investigation and prosecution of nurses suspected of inflicting deliberate harm on patients" by Prof. John O'Quigley explores an interesting hypothesis concerning statistical information hidden in the part of the infamous Lucy Letby roster chart pertaining to the 37 other nurses. Unfortunately, we have to point out some serious errors in his statistical analyses. The data actually contains information which strongly disproves his main modelling assumption. We do, however, strongly agree with him that from a forensic statistical point of view, the roster chart is fake evidence which should not have been shown to jurors.

stat.AP↗

Challenge or Pass? A Dynamic Policy for MLB's Automated Ball-Strike System

Under Major League Baseball's automated ball-strike (ABS) challenge system, players must weigh the value of overturning a call against the risk of losing a challenge they may need later. We develop a policy that values an overturn through its effect on expected runs, accounting for the count, outs, and runners on base. Using pitch tracking and game records, we reconstruct challenge opportunities, including calls that players let stand. A Bayesian model represents players' imperfect impressions of pitch location and uses them to estimate overturn probabilities, with uncertainty calibrated from historical challenge decisions. Dynamic programming compares the expected gain with the future cost of losing a challenge, accounting for the stage of the game, the number of challenges remaining, and opportunities on both offense and defense. We develop the policy using games before the 2026 All-Star break and evaluate it without refitting on 983 games played afterward. Along the recorded sequence of opportunities, the policy recovers 0.536 modeled correction runs per game across both teams, compared with 0.452 under observed decisions, an improvement of 18.5%. The gain is 0.084 runs per game, with a 95% bootstrap interval of [0.065, 0.103]. The policy makes more challenges and recovers more value per successful review despite a lower overturn rate. These results show why overturn rate alone can be a misleading measure of challenge strategy.

stat.AP↗