Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.38442

Calibration of Passive Market Impact with a Queue-Sensitive Propagator Model

Abstract

We develop a framework for calibrating passive market impact, defined as the price response to liquidity-providing limit orders, in contrast to the impact of liquidity-consuming market orders. We build on the model of Ouazzani Chahdi, Rosenbaum, and Szymanski (arxiv:2412.07461), which combines Hawkes-driven market-order flow with queue-reactive limit-order and cancellation dynamics. Within this model, we show that the price decomposes into a universal propagator term driven by signed order-flow imbalance and a state-dependent correction that captures the dependence of price sensitivity on volume at the best quotes. This decomposition links limit-order-book microstructure to standard propagator models and yields a regression on two observable signals: the propagator signal and the queue-weighted order-flow imbalance. We calibrate the model on high-frequency order-book data and find that the passive-impact term explains substantial variation in prices beyond the classical propagator, improving both model fit and the accuracy of predicted impact curves.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yadh Hafsi, Fabrizio Lillo, Grégoire Szymanski. 2026-10-28. Calibration of Passive Market Impact with a Queue-Sensitive Propagator Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38442

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Depositing More Should Not Earn Less: Supplier Income Monotonicity and Rate Curve Design in Pooled Lending Markets

In utilization dependent interest rate models, adding liquidity can reduce a supplier's total interest income even as the supplier's balance increases. A supplier holding a fraction $α$ of final pool supply keeps income nondecreasing with a marginal deposit exactly when $α(1+η)\leq1$, where $η$ is the elasticity of the borrow rate with respect to utilization. When the condition fails, the supplier can instead raise its income by withdrawing, which pushes utilization further up. On two public Drift markets, a lender held more of the pool than the curve protected in at least one hour in nine on SOL and one in thirteen on USDC. A protocol turns this into a design constraint by choosing, at each utilization, the largest supplier share it intends to protect. That choice caps the elasticity, and integrating the cap describes every admissible curve. Protecting the same share at every utilization gives a power law boundary, and protecting every fresh depositor gives a hyperbolic one. On a multiple kink USDT market, compliant repairs can lower or raise supplier income, because the constraint governs how income responds to a deposit and not the price level.

q-fin.TR↗

Optimal Order Placement under a State-Dependent Hawkes Process Limit Order Book model

We study optimal quote placement for a market maker facing order flow modeled by a state-dependent Hawkes process. A block-based linear demand specification links market-order counts to execution volumes, providing the demand moments required by a continuous time discrete state dynamic programming formulation. Under a quadratic terminal inventory penalty, we characterize inventory-dependent quotes and derive backward recursions for the coefficients of a quadratic value function. Numerical experiments using LOBSTER data examine quote distributions, inventory exposure, and terminal wealth. The implemented strategy yields higher aggregate terminal wealth than fixed-spread benchmarks at one and three ticks, but lower wealth than the two-tick benchmark. These results illustrate the framework's numerical implementation and distinguish terminal-wealth comparisons from evaluation under the inventory-penalized objective.

q-fin.TR↗

Do Round Numbers Hold Prices? Occupation Densities and Depth-Conditioned Hazards in the Limit Order Book

Prices cluster at round numbers, a pattern often interpreted as evidence that these levels act as price barriers. This pattern also admits a mechanical explanation: more liquidity rests there, and prices take longer to leave deeper queues. Limit order book data allow us to distinguish these mechanisms through a tick-grid framework in which local time counts departures and level-wise volatility reflects the departure hazard. Using data for five Nasdaq stocks throughout 2025, we find that round levels attract more liquidity but do not exhibit longer depth-adjusted durations. Intel and SoFi show directional effects, with departures biased away from round levels.

q-fin.TR↗