arXiv · 2610.38866
Early warning of critical transitions: Distinguishing supercritical and subcritical bifurcations from noisy observations
Abstract
Early-warning methods can indicate that a system is approaching a loss of stability, but they do not usually reveal whether the approaching bifurcation is supercritical or subcritical. We investigate whether this distinction can be made from noisy pre-transition observations. For this investigation, we extend a regression-based stability method by including the leading cubic nonlinear term, whose sign is used to predict the bifurcation type. We test the method on a stochastic pitchfork model and a spatial stochastic Swift-Hohenberg equation. In both models, classification improves with longer observation horizons, closer proximity to the bifurcation, stronger noise, and larger nonlinear effects. However, these conditions are also linked to a higher risk of noise-induced tipping in the subcritical case. The useful early-warning window is therefore determined by a balance between obtaining enough information to identify the bifurcation type and doing so before noise-induced tipping becomes too likely. In spatially extended systems, we find that observing the full spatial field allows classification over shorter observation horizons, and performance improves when a broader range of spatial modes contributes to the observed dynamics. Altogether, we identify the conditions under which the method can reliably distinguish between supercritical and subcritical bifurcations.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Paul A. Sanders, Christian Kuehn, Bastian Hilder, Robbin Bastiaansen. 2026-10-28. Early warning of critical transitions: Distinguishing supercritical and subcritical bifurcations from noisy observations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38866
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.