Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.39244

CASH: A Capability-Aware Subsidy Harness for Advertiser Subsidy Allocation

Minmao Wang·Huihuang Lin·Likang Wu·Hongke Zhao·Shijie Yi·Fei Pan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Advertising platforms subsidize advertisers through billing discounts, and Advertiser Subsidy Allocation (ASA) chooses a subsidy level for every account to maximize total discounted revenue under a platform-wide subsidy-rate constraint. In practice, operators configure these subsidies from business rules, advertiser tiers and operating goals. Such configuration draws on rich business experience, yet as the advertiser base grows, tier-level policies can neither resolve how individual accounts respond across subsidy levels nor allocate a shared budget at the granularity of single accounts. We propose CASH, a Capability-Aware Subsidy Harness for ASA. CASH pairs a knowledge-guided large language model (LLM) with a data-driven numerical response model, learns from realized outcomes where each is locally reliable across accounts and subsidy levels, and turns this reliability into explicit capability licenses that govern source selection, agent review and budget allocation. Its Expected Policy Coverage Gain (EPCG) directs a limited feedback budget toward evidence expected to expand high-value reliable coverage, and the resulting feedback further improves the numerical model and updates capability estimates. In a one-month online experiment with CASH serving 60% of a large-scale advertising platform's traffic, CASH raises revenue per account by 15.35% and ADVV by 19.86% over Control at an essentially unchanged subsidy rate, with further gains in revenue quality, LTV and retention.

Explore related subjects

cs.IR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Minmao Wang, Huihuang Lin, Likang Wu, Hongke Zhao, Shijie Yi, Fei Pan. 2026-10-29. CASH: A Capability-Aware Subsidy Harness for Advertiser Subsidy Allocation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39244

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Rethinking Group Recommender Systems in the Era of Generative AI: From One-Shot Recommendations to Conversational Group Decision Support

More than twenty-five years ago, early ideas emerged on how to design systems that provide recommendations to groups of users rather than individuals. Since then, a wide range of algorithmic approaches has been proposed to elicit individual preferences, aggregate them, and generate group recommendations. However, despite this substantial body of work, relatively few examples of real-world group recommender systems are in use. This observation invites reflection on the assumptions of the academic research, particularly regarding how inter-group communication unfolds and how recommendation-supported decisions should be made. In this essay, we suggest that some of these assumptions and corresponding system designs may not fully align with users' needs or expectations. We therefore outline a forward-looking perspective that explores how insights from group-decision making research and recent advances in Generative AI, including systems such as ChatGPT, could better inform the design of group recommender systems. As one possible direction, we consider settings in which human group members interact and exchange information through a chat based interface, while an AI-based agent supports the decision-making process. Such an approach may contribute to design more natural group and system interactions, and could help facilitate a broader adoption of group recommender systems in practice.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Membership Inference Attacks on Recommender System: A Survey

Recommender systems (RecSys) have been widely applied to various applications, including E-commerce, finance, healthcare, social media and have become increasingly influential in shaping user behavior and decision-making, highlighting their growing impact in various domains. However, recent studies have shown that RecSys are vulnerable to membership inference attacks (MIAs), which aim to infer whether user interaction record was used to train a target model or not. MIAs on RecSys models can directly lead to a privacy breach. For example, via identifying the fact that a purchase record that has been used to train a RecSys associated with a specific user, an attacker can infer that user's special quirks. In recent years, MIAs have been shown to be effective on other ML tasks, e.g., classification models and natural language processing. However, traditional MIAs are ill-suited for RecSys due to the unseen posterior probability. Although MIAs on RecSys form a newly emerging and rapidly growing research area, there has been no systematic survey on this topic yet. In this article, we conduct the first comprehensive survey on RecSys MIAs. This survey offers a comprehensive review of the latest advancements in RecSys MIAs, exploring the design principles, challenges, attack and defense associated with this emerging field. We provide a unified taxonomy that categorizes different RecSys MIAs based on their characterizations and discuss their pros and cons. Based on the limitations and gaps identified in this survey, we point out several promising future research directions to inspire the researchers who wish to follow this area. This survey not only serves as a reference for the research community but also provides a clear description for researchers outside this research domain.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Contrastive Retrieval Heads for Improved Attention-Based Reranking

The strong zero-shot and long-context capabilities of recent Large Language Models (LLMs) have paved the way for highly effective re-ranking systems. Attention-based re-rankers leverage attention weights from transformer heads to produce relevance scores, but not all heads are created equally: many contribute noise and redundancy, thus limiting performance. To address this, we introduce CoRe heads, a small set of retrieval heads identified via a contrastive scoring metric that explicitly rewards high attention heads that correlate with relevant documents, while downplaying nodes with higher attention that correlate with irrelevant documents. This relative ranking criterion isolates the most discriminative heads for re-ranking and yields a state-of-the-art list-wise re-ranker. Extensive experiments with three LLMs show that aggregated signals from CoRe heads, constituting less than 1% of all heads, substantially improve re-ranking accuracy over strong baselines. We further find that CoRe heads are concentrated in middle layers, and pruning the computation of final 50% of model layers preserves accuracy while significantly reducing inference time and memory usage.

cs.IR↗