Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.39491

Automated Verification of Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing

Min Lai·Yu-Fang Chen·Shih-Han Hung
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first fully automated verification framework for QSP-based Hamiltonian simulation. Our framework exploits the structure of the simulation algorithm: Hamiltonians are given as weighted sums of Pauli strings, embedded into larger unitaries through block encodings, and transformed into time-evolution operators by quantum signal processing (QSP). Using a symbolic Pauli-sum semantics for ancilla-indexed circuit blocks, our verifier proves that the distinguished all-zero ancilla block is proportional to the target Hamiltonian and infers the subnormalization factor automatically. It then verifies the QSP layer by extracting the implemented polynomial transformation and certifying its approximation error. This structure-aware abstraction is essential for scalability. Composing our verified block encoding and QSP wrapper yields an estimated macro-expanded size of about 1.52 million gates. The verifier certifies the block encoding once and checks the QSP layer through its abstract interface, without expanding the oracle calls. Our implementation verifies block encodings of structured Pauli-sum Hamiltonians with up to 256 system qubits and verifies QSP Hamiltonian-simulation instances by extracting their implemented polynomials and checking the resulting approximation bounds. These results show that fully automated verification can handle common Hamiltonian-simulation circuits at substantial scale when it exploits their algorithmic structure.

Explore related subjects

cs.PLcs.LOquant-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Min Lai, Yu-Fang Chen, Shih-Han Hung. 2026-10-29. Automated Verification of Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39491

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Countable Nondeterminism in Weighted Programming with an Application to Mechanized Foundations for Probabilistic Program Verification

Weighted programming is a framework by Batz et al. for describing mathematical models or optimization problems as imperative programs parametrized over semirings and then analyzing them with program verification techniques like weakest precondition calculi. Applications include reasoning about expected outcomes of probabilistic programs and competitive analysis of online algorithms. We extend weighted programming with (1) countable nondeterminism and (2) user-defined additive rewards, where programs are parametrized over modules instead of semirings. The resulting framework enables reasoning about expected resource consumption of probabilistic programs and about optimal scores of combinatorial games. A technical challenge is that wp-calculi for weighted programs with (1) and (2) over arbitrary modules can be unsound, because it is well-known that continuity properties commonly used in program semantics break in the presence of countable nondeterminism. We study conditions under which a wp-style transformer for reasoning about weighted programs is sound with respect to an operational ground truth defined in terms of weighted decision processes (WDPs) - transition systems that generalize Markov decision processes by drawing transition weights and state rewards from a module. Based on those conditions, we show that a range of concrete instances of the weighted programming framework enjoy sound weakest precondition reasoning. We demonstrate the usefulness of our wp-semantics through case studies for different modules. We mechanized our extended weighted programming framework and our main soundness results in the interactive theorem prover Lean. Instantiating these results for probabilistic programming yields, to the best of our knowledge, the first mechanized proof of a fixed point characterization of minimal expected rewards in Markov decision processes with countable nondeterminism.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

A Type System for Communication-Safe Hardware Design

Hardware components communicate through clock-cycle-sensitive protocols. Hardware Description Languages (HDLs), however, provide limited support for expressing these protocols or for checking that independently developed components agree on them. When components disagree, the composed design can perform unsynchronized exchanges or stop making progress. We call these failures communication-safety violations. Communication safety is thus a global property, determined by interactions between components. This makes it difficult to check modularly. This paper presents Pact, a typed extension of Anvil for modular verification of communication safety in synchronous hardware. Pact types describe message-passing, control-flow, and clock-cycle behaviour. Each component is checked against its type. Compatible types guarantee that the components compose into a communication-safe system. Pact also supports incremental design. It can check a subsystem before the rest of the system exists. The check produces a summary type that captures the communication behaviour left for future compositions. To reduce annotation burden, Pact infers types by abstracting payload values while preserving communication, timing, control, and fairness. These inferred types are optimal for the checker: whenever some checker-accepted types can prove compatibility, the inferred types can prove it as well. Type inference and type checking are decidable, and compatibility is decided by a sound and complete algorithm. We implement Pact by extending the Anvil compiler and evaluate it along five dimensions: detecting communication errors in incremental design, expressiveness on ten clock-cycle-accurate translations of open-source hardware IPs, compatibility-checking time, generated hardware overhead, and annotation burden. Pact expresses realistic protocols and verifies all ten benchmarks in reasonable time.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

Proof Repair and (Co)algebra Equivalences

Maintaining formal proofs in response to breaking changes in their dependencies is a major challenge of proof engineering. Proof repair is a kind of proof automation that lessens the burden of this challenge by automatically adapting proofs in response to those changes. While proof repair is well understood through an algorithmic lens, it has, until now, been poorly understood through a theoretical lens. We address this gap by giving the first foundational treatment of proof repair, focusing in particular on type-theoretic proof repair in response to changes in datatypes. Our key insight is that the core component of a proof repair algorithm---a ``configuration''---is exactly an algebra isomorphism. We formalize and prove this insight, answering open questions from prior work. We then take this one step further and show that, by taking the dual of this representation, we obtain proof repair over coinductive types. All of our results are formalized in Agda.

cs.PL↗