Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.40122

xPRT: Cross-Passage Retrieval Pretraining

Abstract

Dense retrievers are a foundational component underlying modern RAG and search systems. Training these models typically requires a curated collection of annotated query-document pairs, which are prohibitively expensive to obtain outside a handful of well-resourced domains. This has motivated a line of work that leverages large-scale unsupervised retrieval pretraining from unlabelled text alone. Most such methods learn by optimizing a language modelling or contrastive learning objective over short spans within a document. This raises the question: how can we extract richer learning signals from a single document for retrieval pretraining? To address it, we introduce xPRT (Cross-Passage Retrieval Pretraining), an unsupervised framework that learns from the key information distributed across an entire document and the connections between its parts. We evaluate xPRT against five state-of-the-art objectives on MTEB English v2, continuing pretraining from a public unsupervised checkpoint while holding the corpus, schedule, and training procedure fixed. Across diverse tasks spanning all task types, we observe that xPRT consistently outperforms the strongest baseline by 3.2% on an average. Notably, in this continual pretraining setting, many baseline methods incur substantial performance regressions, whereas our method delivers the largest complementary gains over the initial pretrained checkpoint. Controlled ablations confirm that xPRT's performance gains stem from its proposed cross-passage signals. xPRT demonstrates that a single unlabelled document is a much richer source of retrieval signal than prior work assumed and offers complementary gains to what current retrievers already capture.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Danush Khanna, Himanshu Singhal, Pranjal A. Chitale, Bishal Santra. 2026-10-29. xPRT: Cross-Passage Retrieval Pretraining. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40122

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Rethinking Group Recommender Systems in the Era of Generative AI: From One-Shot Recommendations to Conversational Group Decision Support

More than twenty-five years ago, early ideas emerged on how to design systems that provide recommendations to groups of users rather than individuals. Since then, a wide range of algorithmic approaches has been proposed to elicit individual preferences, aggregate them, and generate group recommendations. However, despite this substantial body of work, relatively few examples of real-world group recommender systems are in use. This observation invites reflection on the assumptions of the academic research, particularly regarding how inter-group communication unfolds and how recommendation-supported decisions should be made. In this essay, we suggest that some of these assumptions and corresponding system designs may not fully align with users' needs or expectations. We therefore outline a forward-looking perspective that explores how insights from group-decision making research and recent advances in Generative AI, including systems such as ChatGPT, could better inform the design of group recommender systems. As one possible direction, we consider settings in which human group members interact and exchange information through a chat based interface, while an AI-based agent supports the decision-making process. Such an approach may contribute to design more natural group and system interactions, and could help facilitate a broader adoption of group recommender systems in practice.

cs.IR↗

Membership Inference Attacks on Recommender System: A Survey

Recommender systems (RecSys) have been widely applied to various applications, including E-commerce, finance, healthcare, social media and have become increasingly influential in shaping user behavior and decision-making, highlighting their growing impact in various domains. However, recent studies have shown that RecSys are vulnerable to membership inference attacks (MIAs), which aim to infer whether user interaction record was used to train a target model or not. MIAs on RecSys models can directly lead to a privacy breach. For example, via identifying the fact that a purchase record that has been used to train a RecSys associated with a specific user, an attacker can infer that user's special quirks. In recent years, MIAs have been shown to be effective on other ML tasks, e.g., classification models and natural language processing. However, traditional MIAs are ill-suited for RecSys due to the unseen posterior probability. Although MIAs on RecSys form a newly emerging and rapidly growing research area, there has been no systematic survey on this topic yet. In this article, we conduct the first comprehensive survey on RecSys MIAs. This survey offers a comprehensive review of the latest advancements in RecSys MIAs, exploring the design principles, challenges, attack and defense associated with this emerging field. We provide a unified taxonomy that categorizes different RecSys MIAs based on their characterizations and discuss their pros and cons. Based on the limitations and gaps identified in this survey, we point out several promising future research directions to inspire the researchers who wish to follow this area. This survey not only serves as a reference for the research community but also provides a clear description for researchers outside this research domain.

cs.IR↗

Contrastive Retrieval Heads for Improved Attention-Based Reranking

The strong zero-shot and long-context capabilities of recent Large Language Models (LLMs) have paved the way for highly effective re-ranking systems. Attention-based re-rankers leverage attention weights from transformer heads to produce relevance scores, but not all heads are created equally: many contribute noise and redundancy, thus limiting performance. To address this, we introduce CoRe heads, a small set of retrieval heads identified via a contrastive scoring metric that explicitly rewards high attention heads that correlate with relevant documents, while downplaying nodes with higher attention that correlate with irrelevant documents. This relative ranking criterion isolates the most discriminative heads for re-ranking and yields a state-of-the-art list-wise re-ranker. Extensive experiments with three LLMs show that aggregated signals from CoRe heads, constituting less than 1% of all heads, substantially improve re-ranking accuracy over strong baselines. We further find that CoRe heads are concentrated in middle layers, and pruning the computation of final 50% of model layers preserves accuracy while significantly reducing inference time and memory usage.

cs.IR↗