Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.40129

The Generalised Kessler Syndrome and the Persian Gulf

Bernhard K Meister
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The term Kessler syndrome was coined for a runaway orbital cascade creating a high-density debris field. The idea is generalised and applied to supply chains. An additive channel enables failures to generate further failures; a subtractive channel erodes the capacity to contain and restore. When damage outpaces repair, failure becomes irreversible and the system settles into a new state. Supplies connect the theory to its application. Stocks insulate subsystems from one another, and their exhaustion exposes dependencies. For the Persian Gulf states, restrictions on maritime supplies from spring 2026 are inadequately compensated by air and road transport alternatives. This depletes inventories unevenly across products and impairs the functioning of the logistics system itself. Throughput optimisation builds fragility everywhere; the Gulf is where it is becoming visible, with the Strait of Hormuz restriction as the trigger. Formulated as a Kelly portfolio allocation under a weakest-link payoff, the optimal strategy concentrates resources on the lagging rather than the leading inputs.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bernhard K Meister. 2026-10-29. The Generalised Kessler Syndrome and the Persian Gulf. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40129

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Market Regime-Based Multi-Asset Portfolio Optimization Using Nested Clustered Optimization for Tactical Asset Allocation

We investigate the interaction between market regime detection and Nested Clustered Optimization (NCO) for tactical asset allocation across heterogeneous multi-asset portfolios. The central empirical question is whether conditioning the NCO pipeline, encompassing covariance estimation, hierarchical clustering, and weight allocation, on latent market states genuinely enhances risk-adjusted performance, or conversely, whether estimation uncertainty within regime-filtered sub-samples induces severe turnover and performance drag. We implement a causal rolling Gaussian Hidden Markov Model (HMM) coupled with an adaptive rebalancing mechanism that distinguishes regime shifts from portfolio weight drift. The framework is evaluated on a monthly Indonesian multi-asset universe comprising sovereign bond yields (SBN), the LQ45 equity index, spot gold (XAU/IDR), foreign exchange (CNY/IDR), and Bitcoin (BTC/IDR) across a 56-month out-of-sample period (January 2021 to August 2025). Rigorous walk-forward backtesting reveals that standard regime-agnostic NCO achieves remarkable capital preservation and risk-adjusted efficiency, delivering a 29.97% cumulative return (5.78% annualized), a maximum drawdown of only 2.18%, a Calmar ratio of 2.65, and low monthly turnover of 5.41%. In contrast, conditioning NCO on an unconstrained HMM in a small multi-asset universe amplifies parameter estimation noise and induces excessive rebalancing (47 events; 24.58% average monthly turnover), which erodes net cumulative return to 1.60% and increases drawdown to 9.99%. These findings demonstrate that without explicit transition persistence or asymmetric downside objectives, regime-switching frameworks can degrade rather than improve clustered portfolio stability, establishing crucial empirical boundaries for machine learning asset allocation.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Eliciting ESG Preferences for Reinforcement Learning-Based Portfolio Optimization

Modern portfolio management increasingly demands a balance between traditional risk-adjusted returns and strict Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) mandates. Current Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches typically optimize for a single ESG provider, neglecting the significant divergence in rating methodologies across the industry and the unintuitive nature of manually weighting conflicting objectives. This paper addresses these limitations by formulating ESG-aware portfolio optimization as a Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL) problem that simultaneously incorporates ratings from three distinct ESG agencies. To bridge the gap between high-dimensional algorithmic trade-offs and human decision-making, we integrate a Preference Elicitation framework using Gaussian Processes. This system enables practitioners to align the RL policy behavior with their preferences through intuitive pairwise comparisons of candidate portfolios based on their Sharpe ratios and aggregate ESG scores. We systematically evaluate our framework by employing prompt-conditioned LLMs as synthetic preference oracles under varied regional conditions and assess how the methodology adapts to heterogeneous investment behaviors and sustainability preferences. The experiments demonstrate feasibility in a controlled synthetic setting and characterize sensitivity to oracle and prompt design.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Certifying Reward Alignment in Portfolio Reinforcement Learning

Financial reinforcement learning often translates an investment objective into an additive risk-adjusted reward. An agent can optimise that reward accurately yet implement a different financial preference. We develop a decision audit for terminal mean-variance equilibrium that separates reward misspecification from learning error. In a finite exogenous-state market, we bound the gain from changing one action using actor, reward and continuation-critic residuals. The certificate ignores state-constant critic offsets, accommodates convex action constraints, and has an independent-sample extension that does not require the equilibrium policy. A continuation-aware actor-critic method estimates the future-policy correction from samples. Across nine controlled markets and twenty seeds, it reduces policy distance by and one-step deviation gain by relative to a matched myopic-reward network. A separate PPO comparison tests the same reward intervention within a standard optimiser. Historical tests cross seven covariance estimators and 10, 30 and 49 US industry portfolios over 432 months: joint reward calibration preserves each fitted mean-variance target, but does not improve realised investment performance. Together, these results provide a way to quantify whether a learned decision implements its stated financial objective, separately from how well that objective performs in a backtest.

q-fin.PM↗