arXiv · 2610.40677
Asymmetric Decline Rather Than Backfire: A Repost-Network Analysis of Japanese Vaccine-Shedding Misinformation on X
Abstract
This study investigates the diffusion of vaccine-shedding discourse on X in 2024, focusing on polarization in repost networks and reactions to corrective information. Here, "shedding" refers to the scientifically unsupported claim that harmful substances are released from individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 and cause adverse health effects in nearby unvaccinated people. Using 109,170 posts containing the Japanese term for "shedding" and 478,089 reposts collected from January 1 to December 31, 2024, we constructed a post-level repost network, identified discourse clusters, and examined changes in repost participation before and after major events. The results show that shedding discourse formed a two-pole structure consisting of pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine clusters. After news coverage denying shedding, we found no evidence of diffusion-level backfire in anti-vaccine repost activity. Instead, although the overall topic declined, repost participation in the anti-vaccine cluster decreased more sharply than that in the pro-vaccine cluster. User transition analysis further suggests that this change was not driven by the conversion of strongly anti-vaccine users, but by the entry of previously non-expressive users into pro-vaccine diffusion and the withdrawal of anti-vaccine supporters from repost activity. These findings suggest that corrective information may reshape the composition of misinformation diffusion participants without necessarily converting core opponents.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Akinobu Seki, Erina Murata, Masaki Chujyo, Fujio Toriumi. 2026-10-23. Asymmetric Decline Rather Than Backfire: A Repost-Network Analysis of Japanese Vaccine-Shedding Misinformation on X. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40677
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.