Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.40855

ProdCrawl: A Replayable Test Collection for Focused Crawling

Abstract

A focused crawler searches for web pages on a specific topic under a constrained download budget. Since it can only fetch a limited number of pages, its success depends on choosing which links to follow. Focused crawlers are usually evaluated on live websites by harvest rate, the fraction of downloaded pages that are relevant. This has two problems: on the one hand, websites change over time, so a crawl cannot be repeated under the same conditions; on the other hand, there is no ground truth for which pages are relevant. As a result, comparisons between crawlers are unreliable. We present ProdCrawl, a replayable test collection for focused crawling. It comprises static mirrors of 621 company and organization websites, about 1.1 million pages, with each page labeled as a product page or non-product page based on a majority vote among three large language models. Any crawler can be run on exactly the same sites and scored against the same labels. We use ProdCrawl to compare simple baselines (breadth-first, depth-first and text classifiers) with an approach that scores each link by searching for similar link texts whose target pages have already been labeled. Our results show that text classifiers and keyword matching do not significantly outperform breadth-first crawling, whereas neural embeddings, which compare link texts by semantic meaning, outperform all simple strategies. Because every run evaluates over identical pages and labels, these results are exactly reproducible. The collection, codebase, and models are publicly released to support experimental replication and fair crawler comparison.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Manuel Rey-Escobar, David Otero, Javier Parapar. 2026-10-29. ProdCrawl: A Replayable Test Collection for Focused Crawling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40855

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

DAT: Dynamic Alpha Tuning for Hybrid Retrieval in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Hybrid retrieval techniques in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance information retrieval by combining dense and sparse (e.g., BM25-based) retrieval methods. However, existing approaches struggle with adaptability, as fixed weighting schemes fail to adjust to different queries. To address this, we propose DAT (Dynamic Alpha Tuning), a novel hybrid retrieval framework that dynamically balances dense retrieval and BM25 for each query. DAT leverages a large language model (LLM) to evaluate the effectiveness of the top-1 results from both retrieval methods, assigning an effectiveness score to each. It then calibrates the optimal weighting factor through effectiveness score normalization, ensuring a more adaptive and query-aware weighting between the two approaches. Empirical results show that DAT consistently significantly outperforms fixed-weighting hybrid retrieval methods across various evaluation metrics. Even on smaller models, DAT delivers strong performance, highlighting its efficiency and adaptability.

cs.IR↗

Explaining Group Recommendations via Counterfactuals

Group recommender systems help users make collective choices but often lack transparency, leaving group members uncertain about why items are suggested. Existing explanation methods focus on individuals, offering limited support for groups where multiple preferences interact. In this work, we introduce and formalize the problem of finding counterfactual explanations for group recommendations. We introduce a comprehensive set of item- and explanation-level metrics that capture different aspects, such as relevance, popularity, explanation utility, interpretability, and fairness. We design five algorithms that employ techniques such as search-space pruning, greedy selection, early stopping, and incremental refinement to reduce computational cost and the number of recommender calls while producing high-quality explanations. The algorithms consider different trade-offs; for example, some prioritize computational efficiency at the expense of explanation quality, while others focus on improving explanation quality at a higher computational cost. Experiments on real-world datasets analyze these trade-offs in terms of explanation size, computational cost, utility, and fairness.

cs.IR↗

MuonRec: Shifting the Optimizer Paradigm Beyond Adam in Scalable Generative Recommendation

Recommender systems (RecSys) are increasingly emphasizing scaling, leveraging larger architectures and more interaction data to improve personalization. Yet, despite the optimizer's pivotal role in training, modern RecSys pipelines almost universally default to Adam/AdamW, with limited scrutiny of whether these choices are truly optimal for recommendation. In this work, we revisit optimizer design for scalable recommendation and introduce MuonRec, the first framework that brings the recently proposed Muon optimizer to RecSys training. Muon performs orthogonalized momentum updates for 2D weight matrices via Newton-Schulz iteration, promoting diverse update directions and improving optimization efficiency. We develop an open-source training recipe for recommendation models and evaluate it across both traditional sequential recommenders and modern generative recommenders. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MuonRec reduces converged training steps by an average of 32.4\% while simultaneously improving final ranking quality. Specifically, MuonRec yields consistent relative gains in NDCG@10, averaging 12.6\% across all settings, with particularly pronounced improvements in generative recommendation models. These results consistently outperform strong Adam/AdamW baselines, positioning Muon as a promising new optimizer standard for RecSys training. Our code is available.

cs.IR↗