Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.41738

Search When Needed, Proceed When Reliable: Metacognitive Reliability Supervision for Efficient Agentic Search

Abstract

Efficient agentic search requires large language models (LLMs) to determine whether they can reliably proceed with their current knowledge or need additional external evidence. Supervision based on final-answer correctness or trajectory-level feedback evaluates realized trajectory performance. However, observed trajectory performance is jointly shaped by stochastic generation, retrieval quality, and downstream reasoning. Such signals therefore provide only indirect evidence of how reliable the current decision state was and how retrieved evidence changed its reliability. An effective reward should encourage search when external information is needed and favor searches that contribute to the answer. To this end, we propose a metacognitive framework for training LLMs to make search decisions based on the reliability of their intermediate reasoning states. Our framework estimates the reliability of local conclusions to distinguish whether the current information supports proceeding without search from how much retrieved evidence improves that reliability. The current-state reliability score assesses whether the model can proceed without search. The search-action score measures how retrieved evidence changes estimated reliability. Together, these scores define a reliability-aware process reward for Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), providing finer-grained supervision for search and no-search behavior. Experiments across seven question-answering benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves a better accuracy-efficiency trade-off than strong agentic-search baselines. Our code and model checkpoints will be open-sourced.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Minhao Sun, Zhijing Wu, Xian-Ling Mao. 2026-10-30. Search When Needed, Proceed When Reliable: Metacognitive Reliability Supervision for Efficient Agentic Search. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41738

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

DAT: Dynamic Alpha Tuning for Hybrid Retrieval in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Hybrid retrieval techniques in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance information retrieval by combining dense and sparse (e.g., BM25-based) retrieval methods. However, existing approaches struggle with adaptability, as fixed weighting schemes fail to adjust to different queries. To address this, we propose DAT (Dynamic Alpha Tuning), a novel hybrid retrieval framework that dynamically balances dense retrieval and BM25 for each query. DAT leverages a large language model (LLM) to evaluate the effectiveness of the top-1 results from both retrieval methods, assigning an effectiveness score to each. It then calibrates the optimal weighting factor through effectiveness score normalization, ensuring a more adaptive and query-aware weighting between the two approaches. Empirical results show that DAT consistently significantly outperforms fixed-weighting hybrid retrieval methods across various evaluation metrics. Even on smaller models, DAT delivers strong performance, highlighting its efficiency and adaptability.

cs.IR↗

Explaining Group Recommendations via Counterfactuals

Group recommender systems help users make collective choices but often lack transparency, leaving group members uncertain about why items are suggested. Existing explanation methods focus on individuals, offering limited support for groups where multiple preferences interact. In this work, we introduce and formalize the problem of finding counterfactual explanations for group recommendations. We introduce a comprehensive set of item- and explanation-level metrics that capture different aspects, such as relevance, popularity, explanation utility, interpretability, and fairness. We design five algorithms that employ techniques such as search-space pruning, greedy selection, early stopping, and incremental refinement to reduce computational cost and the number of recommender calls while producing high-quality explanations. The algorithms consider different trade-offs; for example, some prioritize computational efficiency at the expense of explanation quality, while others focus on improving explanation quality at a higher computational cost. Experiments on real-world datasets analyze these trade-offs in terms of explanation size, computational cost, utility, and fairness.

cs.IR↗

MuonRec: Shifting the Optimizer Paradigm Beyond Adam in Scalable Generative Recommendation

Recommender systems (RecSys) are increasingly emphasizing scaling, leveraging larger architectures and more interaction data to improve personalization. Yet, despite the optimizer's pivotal role in training, modern RecSys pipelines almost universally default to Adam/AdamW, with limited scrutiny of whether these choices are truly optimal for recommendation. In this work, we revisit optimizer design for scalable recommendation and introduce MuonRec, the first framework that brings the recently proposed Muon optimizer to RecSys training. Muon performs orthogonalized momentum updates for 2D weight matrices via Newton-Schulz iteration, promoting diverse update directions and improving optimization efficiency. We develop an open-source training recipe for recommendation models and evaluate it across both traditional sequential recommenders and modern generative recommenders. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MuonRec reduces converged training steps by an average of 32.4\% while simultaneously improving final ranking quality. Specifically, MuonRec yields consistent relative gains in NDCG@10, averaging 12.6\% across all settings, with particularly pronounced improvements in generative recommendation models. These results consistently outperform strong Adam/AdamW baselines, positioning Muon as a promising new optimizer standard for RecSys training. Our code is available.

cs.IR↗