arXiv · 2610.41957
GENIE: learned quantum circuits as embedding impurity solvers, and why compactness, not correlation strength, decides when they work
Abstract
Sample-based quantum diagonalization has been used as an impurity solver in density matrix embedding theory (DMET), but always with fixed-form circuits and without comparison to classical selection at the same subspace size. We introduce GENIE, a DMET impurity solver in which a generative transformer learns the sampling circuit, trained on the quantum-selected configuration interaction energy. On N2, hydrogen chains, water and a hydrogen ring, we compare GENIE at equal determinant budget with classical selected configuration interaction (CIPSI, ASCI, heat-bath CI) and with DMET combined with sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD). GENIE selects: for N2 at 200 determinants it is within a factor of 1.7 of CIPSI and 25 to 1000 times more accurate than the determinants a fixed circuit actually samples, while standard SQD reaches good energies mainly by filling the subspace. GENIE does not beat the best classical selection, and its circuits require fault-tolerant hardware. Its failures are governed by the compactness of the wavefunction relative to the budget, not by correlation strength. A cheap estimate from coupled-cluster amplitudes predicts this compactness. A router built on it never recommended GENIE where it then failed, apart from seed-to-seed variance, and it transferred unchanged to a blind test on new systems. We also identify two benchmarking pitfalls that can create apparent quantum advantages of one to two orders of magnitude.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Awadhoot Vijay Loharkar, Arcesio Castañeda Medina. 2026-10-30. GENIE: learned quantum circuits as embedding impurity solvers, and why compactness, not correlation strength, decides when they work. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41957
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.