Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.00692

Multilingual TASU: Extending Text-Only Alignment to Multilingual Speech Recognition via Simulated CTC Posteriors

Abstract

Speech Large Language Models (Speech LLMs) achieve strong multilingual ASR when large-scale paired speech-text data is available, yet such resources remain scarce and highly imbalanced across languages. Text-Only Alignment for Speech Understanding (TASU) alleviates this bottleneck by training cross-modal alignment from simulated CTC posteriors without paired audio, but prior work has been limited to English, leaving open whether text-driven alignment can scale to the multilingual setting where data sparsity and cross-lingual phonetic interference amplify the difficulty of learning a shared alignment interface. In this work, we investigate TASU-style posterior alignment as a means of mitigating paired-data scarcity in multilingual ASR. We adopt the native 50,002-way posterior space of a frozen OWSM-CTC frontend as a shared multilingual interface to Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct, and systematically compare three supervision sources on eight Multilingual LibriSpeech languages: real audio-derived posteriors, heuristic CTC Posterior Simulation (CPS), and posteriors generated by a learned multilingual simulator. With real posteriors, LoRA adaptation reduces pooled WER from 10.08% (standalone OWSM-CTC) to 8.21%, improving all eight languages. For text-only alignment, the learned simulator substantially outperforms heuristic CPS and attains 10.51% WER with LoRA. Notably, a CPS-initialized model reaches 9.19% WER after only one real-posterior adaptation epoch using merely one-ninth of the complete MLS paired-speech training set, demonstrating that text-first initialization can drastically reduce the amount of paired audio required for competitive multilingual ASR. These findings establish TASU as a viable multilingual alignment framework and highlight text-only simulation as an effective remedy for paired-data scarcity and imbalance across languages.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chenghao Wang, Yi Yang, Jing Peng, Yu Xi, Shuai Wang, Kai Yu. 2026-10-31. Multilingual TASU: Extending Text-Only Alignment to Multilingual Speech Recognition via Simulated CTC Posteriors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00692

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

NVV-Locator: From Transcript Tags to Acoustic Boundaries for Fine-Grained Nonverbal Vocalization Grounding

Human speech includes nonverbal vocalizations (NVVs), such as laughter, sighs, breaths, and coughs, which convey affective and interactional information. Existing approaches typically represent NVVs as transcript-level tags, providing limited supervision for their waveform-time boundaries. We present NVV-Locator for fine-grained NVV temporal grounding. We first unify 26 NVV categories across public resources and construct large-scale timestamp-supervised training data through dual-LLM verification, transcript-guided forced alignment, and energy-based boundary refinement. We further introduce NVV-TimeBench, an expert-refined benchmark with 667 utterances and 1,094 events. NVV-Locator uses a non-autoregressive slot-filling architecture to jointly predict lexical timestamps, NVV categories, and event boundaries. On NVV-TimeBench, it achieves 71.0% Micro F1, 70.2% Macro F1, 80.4% Macro mIoU, and 59.6 ms Macro mMAE, outperforming the evaluated large audio model counterparts. Evaluation on an external corpus further demonstrates the cross-corpus generalization of NVV-Locator.

eess.AS↗

Attendance-guided speaker enrollment across meetings

Speaker-aware applications rely on enrolled voice profiles, yet collecting enrollment speech from every participant is impractical. Meeting archives provide an alternative source of enrollment speech, comprising recordings of recurring participants paired with expected attendance lists. We investigate whether expected attendance lists can be cross-referenced with diarized anonymous speaker clusters to identify reliable enrollment speech for recurring participants. The resulting task, multi-participant automatic enrollment, must accommodate two types of attendance noise: a listed participant may not speak, and a speaker may be unlisted. To this end, we introduce a benchmark for the task: a synthetic corpus calibrated to an in-house meeting corpus, paired with a contamination-sensitive evaluation protocol. The reference method we introduce scores cross-session cluster chains against expected-attendance patterns and abstains when the evidence is insufficient. We quantify the reference method's benchmark performance as a trade-off between enrollment success and contamination. Applying synthetic-development thresholds unchanged to real meetings exposes a synthetic-to-real gap that remains an open challenge. We will release the benchmark generator and evaluation code.

eess.AS↗

VeriSpoof: Beyond Real or Fake with One Audio LLM

A speech deepfake detector estimates whether a recording is synthetic, but a forensic analyst also asks which system produced it, whether recordings share a source, and what evidence supports each conclusion. We present VeriSpoof, an audio language model that unifies five tasks with shared weights: deepfake detection, generator attribution (generator, acoustic model and vocoder), recording-condition analysis, synthesized-span localisation, and source verification. Each decision is supported by grounded rationales whose statements can be independently verified. Answers are scored by sentence likelihood, allowing detection and source verification to be thresholded without separate heads. Rationale statements can be checked against waveform measurements, span labels, or generator metadata. Counterfactual examples train decisions to follow the stated evidence. Across the 14 Speech-DF-Arena test sets, VeriSpoof-Plus achieves 2.14% pooled EER, ranking third of 28 systems and first among open-weight systems. VeriSpoof-Base, trained only on official training splits of eight corpora, achieves 4.43% EER, less than half that of the next open-weight detector. With the same weights, VeriSpoof-Plus verifies whether recordings from generators unseen in training share a source at 6.2% EER. Controlled studies show that the audio representation governs detection, the LLM governs recording comparison, and source supervision is necessary for neural-codec fakes. Statement-checkable rationales catch partial fakes missed by one-step answers (99.6% vs. 78.4% on PartialEdit) and determine decisions under edits unseen in training (99.5%). Training updates only 29.7M of 2.85B parameters, fitting a single 24 GB GPU with gradient checkpointing. We release both models, inference code, a demo, and VeriSpoof-Bench, the evaluation suite covering these questions.

eess.AS↗