Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.02038

QueueTrack: Framework for Detecting the Onset of Queueing in Mobile Networks

Hamid Hassani·Anudeep Karnam·Kishor Joshi·Sonia M. Heemstra·Ignas G. Niemegeers·George Exarchakos
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In mobile networks, timely and accurate detection of the onset of queueing at path bottlenecks remains challenging for end-to-end congestion control algorithms (CCAs), where end hosts have limited visibility into queue status. Traditional congestion signals, such as packet loss, round-trip time (RTT), and one-way delay (OWD), have well-known limitations for early queue buildup detection. This paper presents QueueTrack, a practical end-host framework to detect the onset of queueing in mobile networks. QueueTrack computes a queue buildup indicator, denoted QBI, from endpoint-observable packet-level timing statistics, without requiring tight synchronization between end hosts or modifications to the existing network infrastructure. We develop and assess the complete QueueTrack machine learning (ML) pipeline, including data collection, labeling, model training, and testing, on a 5G testbed built on the OpenAirInterface platform, under a range of scenarios with competing TCP traffic. The experimental results show that QueueTrack can reliably detect the onset of queueing at the 5G base station using low-complexity classification models such as logistic regression. For example, QueueTrack achieves an F1 score of approximately 80% in a challenging mixed TCP/UDP scenario. These findings confirm that QueueTrack can serve as a practical framework for developing CCAs that target low delay, as well as for network telemetry and network monitoring in mobile networks.

Explore related subjects

cs.NI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hamid Hassani, Anudeep Karnam, Kishor Joshi, Sonia M. Heemstra, Ignas G. Niemegeers, George Exarchakos. 2026-11-01. QueueTrack: Framework for Detecting the Onset of Queueing in Mobile Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02038

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Which Deep Learner? A Systematic Evaluation of Advanced Deep Forecasting Models Accuracy and Efficiency for Network Traffic Prediction

Network traffic prediction is an essential tool for automating modern network management. It is a difficult time series forecasting (TSF) problem that has been addressed by Deep Learning (DL) models due to their ability to capture complex patterns. Recent years have witnessed advances in deep forecasting models, from sophisticated transformer architectures to simple linear models, improving performance across diverse prediction tasks. However, given the diversity of these models, the variability of network traffic across environments and timescales, and the inherent challenges of network traffic prediction, it is essential to identify effective deployment choices and modeling directions. Henceforth, this study systematically identifies 12 deep forecasting models, comprising 8 advanced TSF models and 4 traditional deep learning architectures -- each with unique advantages for network traffic prediction -- against 3 statistical baselines, for a total of 15 forecasting methods and evaluate them on four real traffic datasets, across multiple time scales and horizons, assessing performance, robustness to anomalies, data gaps, external factors, data efficiency, and resource efficiency in terms of time, memory, and energy. Our results provide insights into model behaviour and guidelines for network management, highlighting performance regimes, efficiency thresholds, and promising architectures that balance accuracy, efficiency, and robustness to traffic challenges.

cs.NI↗
arXiv2026

ORCHID: Fairness-Aware Orchestration in Mission-Critical Air-Ground Integrated Networks

Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) provide on-demand wireless coverage for mission-critical Air-Ground Integrated Networks (AGINs). However, DRL-based orchestration faces challenges from multi-agent non-stationarity and the trade-off between energy efficiency (EE) and service fairness. To address these issues, we propose ORCHID (Orchestration of Resilient Coverage via Hybrid Intelligent Deployment), a stability-enhanced two-stage learning framework. First, GBS-aware topology partitioning provides a topology-informed warm start for UAV deployment. Second, a Reset-and-Finetune (R\&F) mechanism is integrated into Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (MAPPO) to support stable late-stage policy refinement through event-triggered rollback and learning-rate adaptation. To study the efficiency-fairness trade-off, ORCHID employs a Max-Min Fairness (MMF)-oriented bandwidth allocation based on a closed-form Egalitarian Bargaining Game (EBG) solution and is compared with Proportional Fairness (PF). Experiments show stronger served-user bottleneck-rate protection under MMF, together with competitive coverage and user-rate fairness and favorable energy-efficiency and UAV-load-balancing performance under zero-shot scalability and mobility tests. Overall, ORCHID provides an effective balance among user-level service protection, energy efficiency, and policy stability for resilient mission-critical UAV networks.

cs.NI↗
arXiv2026

Halley: A Predictive Control Plane for Optical AI Data Center Networks

A frontier AI model is trained in an AI data center, on tens of thousands of accelerators joined by a dedicated network, and every training step ends with all of them exchanging data at once. Between racks, that network is optical, and each of its four layers, from lasers to switches, runs a fixed or after-the-fact policy. Lasers sharing an enclosure, cooling, and power can fail together. At a fixed spare ratio, correlated failure provably caps a pool's availability however large it grows. In this paper, we present a comprehensive predictive control plane framework, called Halley, that reads each resource's next state and acts before the failure occurs. It has four components, each carrying a formal guarantee: LightReserve that sizes the laser pool to provide a coverage bound, FoldFit that schedules the switch within $11/9$ of the optimal, ThermaLead that holds a microring with one-step-ahead control, and TriageGuard that protects the highest-risk modules first. Halley gives each layer a predictive controller that defers to the deployed policy when unsure. Composed from simulations at that point, effective goodput, the share of ideal throughput kept, rises from 65.2\% to 76.5\% if a window that exhausts its spares is lost. If only the dark channels' bandwidth is lost, it reaches 67.4\%. Per megawatt, that is up to 1.03--1.17 times the training; for the same training, up to 3.3--14.7\% less data center capacity. \textsf{Halley}'s fallback circuits are formally verified and are shown to achieve close timing on a commercial FPGA, and pass a 130~nm signoff.

cs.NI↗