Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.02081

Understanding the relationship between retrospective soundscape attributes and continuous pleasantness and eventfulness ratings

Yuanbo Hou·Kening Guo·Francesco Aletta·Woon-Seng Gan·Dick Botteldooren·Jian Kang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Soundscape studies ask listeners to rate perceived affective quality (PAQ) attributes, such as pleasant and vibrant, after listening to recordings or experiencing acoustic environments. These retrospective ratings summarise an experience during which impressions may change. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) procedures convert these PAQ ratings into Pleasantness and Eventfulness scores. Pleasantness and Eventfulness (P/E) can also be rated directly and continuously during listening, capturing changes in reported perception over time. Retrospective PAQ ratings and continuous direct P/E describe the same soundscape experience from different perspectives. We examine how PAQs relate to direct P/E and how ISO-derived P/E corresponds to direct judgements, using 1,782 paired 30-s trials involving audiovisual recordings from 18 streets. The results show that PAQs retain a predominantly two-dimensional structure. Vibrant and Monotonous lie closer to the Eventfulness-Uneventfulness axis in the direct P/E plane than in the ISO 2025 reference geometry. The full 30-s direct P/E mean has lower calibrated error against ISO-derived P/E than three 10-s means. An empirical mapping using the same 8 PAQs reduces held-out joint root-mean-square error by 4.9% relative to affine-calibrated ISO 2025 scoring. The findings show that retrospective and continuous assessments offer related but distinct soundscape descriptions.

Explore related subjects

eess.AScs.SD

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuanbo Hou, Kening Guo, Francesco Aletta, Woon-Seng Gan, Dick Botteldooren, Jian Kang. 2026-11-01. Understanding the relationship between retrospective soundscape attributes and continuous pleasantness and eventfulness ratings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02081

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

NVV-Locator: From Transcript Tags to Acoustic Boundaries for Fine-Grained Nonverbal Vocalization Grounding

Human speech includes nonverbal vocalizations (NVVs), such as laughter, sighs, breaths, and coughs, which convey affective and interactional information. Existing approaches typically represent NVVs as transcript-level tags, providing limited supervision for their waveform-time boundaries. We present NVV-Locator for fine-grained NVV temporal grounding. We first unify 26 NVV categories across public resources and construct large-scale timestamp-supervised training data through dual-LLM verification, transcript-guided forced alignment, and energy-based boundary refinement. We further introduce NVV-TimeBench, an expert-refined benchmark with 667 utterances and 1,094 events. NVV-Locator uses a non-autoregressive slot-filling architecture to jointly predict lexical timestamps, NVV categories, and event boundaries. On NVV-TimeBench, it achieves 71.0% Micro F1, 70.2% Macro F1, 80.4% Macro mIoU, and 59.6 ms Macro mMAE, outperforming the evaluated large audio model counterparts. Evaluation on an external corpus further demonstrates the cross-corpus generalization of NVV-Locator.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Attendance-guided speaker enrollment across meetings

Speaker-aware applications rely on enrolled voice profiles, yet collecting enrollment speech from every participant is impractical. Meeting archives provide an alternative source of enrollment speech, comprising recordings of recurring participants paired with expected attendance lists. We investigate whether expected attendance lists can be cross-referenced with diarized anonymous speaker clusters to identify reliable enrollment speech for recurring participants. The resulting task, multi-participant automatic enrollment, must accommodate two types of attendance noise: a listed participant may not speak, and a speaker may be unlisted. To this end, we introduce a benchmark for the task: a synthetic corpus calibrated to an in-house meeting corpus, paired with a contamination-sensitive evaluation protocol. The reference method we introduce scores cross-session cluster chains against expected-attendance patterns and abstains when the evidence is insufficient. We quantify the reference method's benchmark performance as a trade-off between enrollment success and contamination. Applying synthetic-development thresholds unchanged to real meetings exposes a synthetic-to-real gap that remains an open challenge. We will release the benchmark generator and evaluation code.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

VeriSpoof: Beyond Real or Fake with One Audio LLM

A speech deepfake detector estimates whether a recording is synthetic, but a forensic analyst also asks which system produced it, whether recordings share a source, and what evidence supports each conclusion. We present VeriSpoof, an audio language model that unifies five tasks with shared weights: deepfake detection, generator attribution (generator, acoustic model and vocoder), recording-condition analysis, synthesized-span localisation, and source verification. Each decision is supported by grounded rationales whose statements can be independently verified. Answers are scored by sentence likelihood, allowing detection and source verification to be thresholded without separate heads. Rationale statements can be checked against waveform measurements, span labels, or generator metadata. Counterfactual examples train decisions to follow the stated evidence. Across the 14 Speech-DF-Arena test sets, VeriSpoof-Plus achieves 2.14% pooled EER, ranking third of 28 systems and first among open-weight systems. VeriSpoof-Base, trained only on official training splits of eight corpora, achieves 4.43% EER, less than half that of the next open-weight detector. With the same weights, VeriSpoof-Plus verifies whether recordings from generators unseen in training share a source at 6.2% EER. Controlled studies show that the audio representation governs detection, the LLM governs recording comparison, and source supervision is necessary for neural-codec fakes. Statement-checkable rationales catch partial fakes missed by one-step answers (99.6% vs. 78.4% on PartialEdit) and determine decisions under edits unseen in training (99.5%). Training updates only 29.7M of 2.85B parameters, fitting a single 24 GB GPU with gradient checkpointing. We release both models, inference code, a demo, and VeriSpoof-Bench, the evaluation suite covering these questions.

eess.AS↗