Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.02670

Multiplicity one for a linear spherical pair and its unitary analogue

Abstract

We prove multiplicity one for a linear spherical pair associated with $\mathrm{GL}_4(F)\times\mathrm{GL}_2(F)$ and its unitary similitude analogue associated with $\mathrm{GU}(2,2)(F)\times\mathrm{GU}(1,1)(F)$. Both results hold for all irreducible admissible representations over non-Archimedean local fields of characteristic zero. Generalized Harish-Chandra descent reduces the proofs to the analysis of closed orbits and their normal representations. The unitary proof combines reductions to the linear case with a rational classification of closed orbits and a separate analysis of the remaining normal representations. We also establish multiplicity one for unitary Shalika periods of $\mathrm{GU}(2,2)(F)$ with arbitrary irreducible admissible coefficients. A theta-period identity relates these periods to the unitary spherical pair. By varying the splitting character, we prove that every irreducible admissible representation of $\mathrm{GU}(2,2)(F)$ occurs as a quotient of a suitable big theta lift, allowing the multiplicity-one bound to pass to the Shalika periods. The linear argument also recovers Rallis's multiplicity-one theorem for twisted Jacquet modules of $\mathrm{GL}_4(F)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuxuan Ge. 2026-11-02. Multiplicity one for a linear spherical pair and its unitary analogue. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02670

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A lecture note on covering theory in representation theory of algebras

Covering theory is an important tool in representation theory of algebras, however, the results and the proofs are scattered in the literature. We give an introduction to covering theory at a level as elementary as possible and in a more general way on some basic notions than the existing literature does.

math.RT↗

On the Orthogonal Projections

Let $A$ be a finite-dimensional algebra and $e$ a rigid presentation. We give an explicit formula for the left adjoint to the inclusion $\operatorname{rep}(e^\perp)\hookrightarrow \operatorname{rep}(A)$ and construct a bijection between presentations in $\operatorname{rep}(e^\perp)$ and presentations compatible with $e$. The induced bijection on weights preserves generic $\operatorname{E}$-invariants and canonical decompositions. If $A$ is Jacobian, the reduction algebra is Jacobian for every rigid $e$. We prove mutation formulas for the signed completions and for the dimension vectors of the simple objects of $\operatorname{rep}(e^\perp)$, enabling an algorithm to find the projected quiver with potential when $e$ is extended-reachable. Additionally, we introduce a modified projection for quivers with potentials that preserves general presentations. For applications to cluster algebras, we establish a connection to the stabilization functors.

math.RT↗

Compatible gradings on dg models and cluster equivalence

Let $\La_1$ and $\La_2$ be finite-dimensional $\ta_2$-finite complex algebras of global dimension at most two. We prove that, if they are cluster equivalent, then they admit $\bbZ$-gradings for which the bounded derived categories of graded modules are triangle equivalent. The equivalence is not required to commute with the internal grading shifts. The proof uses common multigraded dg models, relative gradings on two-term silting objects, and covering quotients. We also consider tilting lifts of cluster-tilting objects with endomorphism algebras of global dimension at most two. In acyclic cluster type, the existence of such a lift for every cluster-tilting object implies piecewise heredity. We construct a counterexample without this assumption using a surface algebra associated with a one-holed torus.

math.RT↗