arXiv · 2611.03880
The Hyperclique Hypothesis is False
Abstract
The Hyperclique Hypothesis postulates that, for all constants $k > h \geq 3$, detecting a $k$-clique in an $h$-uniform hypergraph with $n$ vertices requires time $n^{k-o(1)}$. This hypothesis is false: there is an algebraic algorithm that detects (and even counts) $k$-cliques in $h$-uniform hypergraphs in time $O(n^{(1-ε_h)k})$. Via known reductions, this also refutes the recently proposed $k$-AP Hypothesis. As a consequence, many problems with conditional lower bounds based on these two hypotheses may admit faster algorithms after all. This result is almost entirely due to AI.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Nick Fischer. 2026-11-02. The Hyperclique Hypothesis is False. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03880
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.