Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.06429

Neural Network-based Control Systems with Application to Flight Control, From Classical Neural Control to Reinforcement Learning

Abstract

This book provides a comprehensive and systematic exploration of neural network-based intelligent control systems for aerospace applications, bridging foundational theory with practical implementation. It is structured into two primary parts: Part I covers model-based control design, detailing Feedback Error Learning (FEL), pseudocontrol strategies, and neural backstepping for strict-feedback systems, along with practical refinements such as learning rule modifications, composite learning, and discrete-time formulations, all grounded in rigorous Lyapunov stability analysis. Part II introduces model-free control, laying the groundwork for Reinforcement Learning and Approximate Dynamic Programming. Throughout, theoretical concepts are solidified through detailed case studies on quadrotor UAVs, fixed-wing aircraft (GTM), satellites, and hypersonic flight vehicles, complete with performance metrics, parameter sensitivity analyses, and discussions of actuator faults, input constraints, and wind disturbances, making the book an invaluable resource for students and practicing engineers seeking to design, simulate, and analyze intelligent flight control systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Seyyed Ali Emami, Paolo Castaldi, Mohammad Narimani, Mahdi Shahrajabian, Mostafa Ezabadi, Alireza Ettelaei, Hosein Saadatmanesh, Zahra Shahbazi. 2026-11-04. Neural Network-based Control Systems with Application to Flight Control, From Classical Neural Control to Reinforcement Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06429

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Modeling Rainwater Harvesting Systems with Covered Storage Tank on A Smartphone

A model for simulating rainwater harvesting systems with a covered storage tank is described. The model is simple enough to serve as the simulation engine of a smartphone app for designing such systems. The results of the simulation can be used to find the optimum tank size and the reliability of the system in meeting a given demand. This is illustrated by using the model for designing two such systems, one in an urban environment and the other in an arid rural location. The Python scripts used for the simulations are included as ancillary material.

eess.SY↗

To Learn or Not to Learn: A Screening Test for Control Problems Before Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement learning (RL) can be a powerful alternative to classical control methods when standard model-based control is insufficient, e.g., when deriving a suitable model is intractable or impossible. However, in many cases, the choice between model-based and RL-based control is not obvious. Because training RL agents is computationally expensive, RL should be limited to cases where it is expected to outperform model-based control. To the best of our knowledge, there exists no approach to automatically screen out control problems before RL training for which RL is not expected to yield any benefit. In this work, we take the first step towards such an automated screening test. We present a test that identifies problems for which RL-based control is not expected to be superior in two steps. Only control problems that pass both steps should be considered for RL. Part I evaluates the suitability of a provided model for model-based control by analyzing the impact of its uncertainties on the control problem. For this, we use reachset-conformant system identification combined with simulation-based analysis. If the uncertainties are found to be relevant in Part I, Part II then evaluates their learnability using a statistically calibrated dependence analysis. We apply our screening test to several benchmarks, reliably identifying control problems for which RL-based control does not measurably improve upon model-based control, thereby achieving a speed-up of up to $21\times$ compared to trying RL.

eess.SY↗

State-Feedback Passivity Control for Synchronous Machine Systems

The passivity of a generating station enables network stability to be established from conditions verified locally at each station. For synchronous machines, however, passivity can only be certified under conditions on the operating point, and these conditions fail under heavy loading and weak damping. This paper develops a state-feedback controller that enforces passivity using a storage battery connected at the terminal bus. A bilinear term arising from the product of the rotor-speed and stator-current deviations is treated as a bounded uncertainty, leading to robust positive-real conditions that can be enforced by a state feedback control designed using a single algebraic Riccati equation. The resulting controller guarantees passivity whenever the Riccati equation admits a positive-definite solution, with no separate condition on the operating point. Numerical examples show that existing conditions certify passivity only up to a fraction of the rated current, whereas the proposed state-feedback approach certifies it at the rated operating point of the machine.

eess.SY↗