Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07120

A Rough Instantaneous Squared VIX Model for Term Structure and Option Pricing

Abstract

The VIX term structure provides forward-looking measures of market uncertainty across horizons, while VIX options allow investors to hedge volatility risk. This paper proposes a rough instantaneous squared VIX (RISVIX) model by introducing fractional memory into the conventional Markovian framework. We derive an explicit representation of the VIX term structure governed by Mittag--Leffler decay and a semi-closed-form pricing formula for VIX options based on an affine Fourier--Laplace transform. These results support a two-step calibration procedure that estimates memory, mean reversion, and date-specific initial states from VIX term-structure indices before calibrating the remaining distributional parameters to VIX option prices. Using daily VIX term-structure indices and VIX option quotes from January 2018 to June 2025, we find that RISVIX improves upon the Markovian benchmark in fitting the VIX term structure, with larger gains during elevated-volatility periods and for its slope and curvature. RISVIX also improves out-of-sample option pricing, reducing MSE and MAE by 13.06\% and 6.33\%, respectively, with larger gains at shorter maturities and in high-VIX states. These findings suggest that the gains from fractional memory are particularly pronounced when volatility is elevated and can be obtained within a tractable direct model of VIX derivatives. Comparisons with additional benchmarks from the recent literature also show improvements to varying degrees in both VIX term-structure fitting and option pricing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tianfeng Yang, Wen Su, Blanka Horvath. 2026-11-04. A Rough Instantaneous Squared VIX Model for Term Structure and Option Pricing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07120

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Reaction-boundary variance and adjoint-consistent local-volatility projection

We derive an operational-time variance kernel for a latent-order-book reaction boundary and use it to separate three objects usually collapsed in calendar-time volatility models: a structural boundary cumulant, a clock projection, and a pricing-measure choice. The reaction boundary is the zero of a bid--ask imbalance field. For a locally linear book, signed order-flow perturbations displace this zero through a damped Abel response kernel, so the variance of boundary increments is obtained as a finite-scale Green-function cumulant rather than introduced as a primitive diffusion coefficient. For long-memory forcing with exponent $0<γ<1$, the operational variance has a closed asymptotic form involving effective signed-forcing intensity, liquidity slope, resilience, memory, and operational coarse-graining scale. A deterministic activity clock gives the benchmark local-volatility projection. More general, non-unique clocks generate candidate calendar-time pricing systems. We argue that such projections are admissible only when the induced forward density operator and backward valuation operator remain adjoint on the same state space. Adjoint consistency is therefore a reality constraint on operational-to-calendar time projection: it disciplines non-unique time and identifies where incompleteness enters.

q-fin.PR↗

Information-Theoretic Model for the Growth Optimal Portfolio of Stocks

Drawing on information-theoretic principles and empirical evidence, a proxy for the growth-optimal portfolio of stocks (the benchmark) is constructed and modeled. The derivative of its activity time captures overreactions in trading behavior and follows a fast-moving, quasi-stationary scalar diffusion. The benchmark's log-returns are predicted to follow a Student t distribution with degrees of freedom slightly less than four, and this prediction is tested empirically. With the benchmark as numeraire, the derived model enables benchmark-neutral pricing and hedging.

q-fin.PR↗

Quantifying Repair Risk in Crypto Option Surfaces

Option desks adjust crypto option quotes into price surfaces that remain within bid-ask intervals and satisfy standard no-arbitrage restrictions across strikes before computing Greeks, hedge quantities, or risk measures. For the same quote panel, however, these constraints may admit multiple such surfaces, which we call admissible repairs, with different downstream outputs. We define the resulting variation as repair risk and propose repair-risk validation, a matched framework for quantifying dispersion in Greeks, hedge quantities, and risk measures. The mechanism is finite-difference amplification: two admissible repairs within price distance $\varepsilon$ can differ in local normalized-strike curvature by $4\varepsilon/h^2$, where $h$ is local normalized-strike spacing. We evaluate repair risk on Deribit BTC and ETH option chains, using $L_1$ and $L_2$ projections of midpoint prices onto the same admissible set as matched controls. Across 108 matched evaluations spanning 18 sampled calendar months, the median 90th percentile of the scaled spot-gamma gap for $L_2$ versus the $ρ=10$ smoothness-penalized repair is nearly twenty times the matched $L_1$--$L_2$ control. We also instantiate NN-Proj, a neural-projection repair, to test whether learned repairs exhibit repair risk. Despite good held-out fit, its downstream outputs remain distinct from those of classical repairs. Across five seeds with the same training window and architecture, its curvature dispersion exceeds the matched $L_1$--$L_2$ control in 17 of 18 months ($p=1.45\times10^{-4}$). For a USD 1 million risk reversal, switching from $L_2$ to the $ρ=10$ repair shifts the median 90th-percentile hedge notional by 18.62 basis points of gross spot notional. VaR-style estimates also exhibit greater dispersion across repairs. The repair rule is therefore part of the risk model, not merely a feasibility check.

q-fin.PR↗