Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07143

Between Heisenberg and Feynman: Ettore Majorana's Reflections on the Meaning of Quantum Theory

Abstract

Ettore Majorana is undoubtedly one of the most important figures in 20th-century Italian science. His contributions to nuclear physics and Quantum Mechanics (QM) included innovative ideas, and the search for Majorana-type neutrinos remains an ongoing experimental research question. However, very little is known about his perspective on the significance of the quantum state, the philosophical implications of the then-new mechanics, and the relationship between QM and other sciences. This chapter aims to address this gap. In more detail, here I present the standard interpretation of Majorana's view on the quantum state, according to which the Italian physicist anticipated the physical content of Feynman's path-integral formulation of quantum theory. In what follows, I critically examine this position and propose an alternative understanding of Majorana's beliefs on the nature of the quantum state and the wave function. Finally, I briefly discuss his reflections concerning the major conceptual revolutions introduced by QM, notably, in his view, the impossibility of extending the objectivity and determinism of classical mechanics to the quantum realm, and their consequences for the relation between physics and the social sciences, disciplines that Majorana deeply studied before his disappearance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrea Oldofredi. 2026-11-04. Between Heisenberg and Feynman: Ettore Majorana's Reflections on the Meaning of Quantum Theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07143

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Theory of Partial Truth for Scientific Statements

Scientific representations often combine accurate and inaccurate components, which a single bivalent classification does not distinguish. This paper develops a restricted formal framework for estimating partial factual truth. For fixed content and valuation criteria, the target is adequacy to the facts, independent of the available evidence; its numerical assessment through evidence remains fallible. Quantitative claims are evaluated by normalized discrepancies between asserted and empirically supported values. Admissible finite conjunctions are assessed over a fixed basis of distinct elementary claims using arithmetic or relevance-weighted means. The resulting valuations preserve the contributions from accurate components and are independent of grouping when component counts or total weights are retained. Zero-relevance additions leave the contextual valuation unchanged, but compensation remains possible among components with positive relevance. Worked examples examine admissibility, changes of granularity, measurement indeterminacy, and sensitivity of comparisons to discrepancy scales and relevance weights. An astrophysical application connects the assessment to published observations. The framework applies to selected testable consequences of models and theories, without providing a numerical calculus for arbitrary formulas or a unique method for choosing scales and weights. It permits conditional comparisons of factual adequacy while distinguishing them from confidence, empirical coverage, and convergence toward a complete truth.

physics.hist-ph↗

The Search for the Top Quark

The discovery of the top quark in 1995 completed the roster of the matter particles, quarks and leptons, expected in the Standard Model and in many of its suggested extensions. However, the top quark does not conform to the pattern set by its sister quarks and has come to be a critical component of the ongoing searches for physics beyond the prevailing paradigm. (Prepared for the Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the History of Particle Physics, CERN, Nov. 2025.)

physics.hist-ph↗

Holistic Versus Fragmented Multiverses: Empirical Access via Causal and Grounding Signatures

Several objections have been raised against the scientificity of multiverse scenarios. This chapter defends the scientificity of certain multiverse scenarios by distinguishing fragmented from holistic multiverses. Concepts of multiverse used in physics are almost always holistic: they embed universes within a broader, unifying physical or metaphysical multiversal structure that can, in principle, leave empirical signatures inside the universes. I develop a classification of such signatures and show how it applies to a number of scenarios from quantum theory, cosmology, and string theory. The framework clarifies why objections such as the `this universe' objection and a newly articulated generalization, the epistemic isolation objection, fail against scientifically motivated multiverses.

physics.hist-ph↗