Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07497

Distinguishing invariants of Cayley Graphs, Hamming graphs, and wreath product actions

Abstract

Let $Γ$ be a nontrivial group that acts on a graph $G=(V,E)$. The total distinguishing number $D''_Γ(V\cup E)$ (distinguishing index $D'_Γ(E)$) of the action is the least number of labels required for a total labeling (edge labeling) of $G$ so that the only elements of $Γ$ that preserve the labeling belong to the pointwise stabilizer of $V\cup E$ (pointwise stabilizer of $E$). We obtain upper bounds of these invariants for Cayley graphs and under various group actions, including free actions, wreath product actions, and coordinatewise actions on Cartesian powers of graphs. Our first main result shows that, if $Γ$ acts faithfully on $G$, with $|V|\geq 2, |E|\geq 1$ and the natural action of the wreath product $W=Γ\wr S_k$ on $V^k$ induces an action of $W$ on the Cartesian power $G^{k}=(V^{k},E_k)$, then $ D''_{W}(V^k\cup E_k)\le D''_Γ(V\cup E)+k-1 $ for any $k\geq 2$. We also establish the sharpness of several of our bounds through examples involving cyclic, symmetric, and alternating groups. Moreover, we determine these distinguishing invariants for the symmetric group action on Hamming graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amitayu Banerjee. 2026-11-05. Distinguishing invariants of Cayley Graphs, Hamming graphs, and wreath product actions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07497

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Domination in Johnson graphs J(n, 3) for odd n

In 2025 Cornet, Dravec, and Torres determined the domination number $γ(J(n,3))$ of the Johnson graph for every even $n \ge 6$, expressing it as a closed form $ϕ_n$ in terms of Fort-Hedlund covering numbers, and conjectured the same value for odd $n$. We prove this conjecture: $γ(J(n,3)) = ϕ_n$ for every odd $n \ge 7$. A dominating set of $J(n,3)$ is the same as a lotto design $\mathrm{LD}(n,3,3,2)$, and the lotto numbers $L(n,3,3,2)$, and hence $γ(J(n,3))$, were already determined for every $n$ by Bate (1978) and by Brouwer (1981); a short degree argument of Füredi, Székely, and Zubor (1996) gives the same lower bound for all $n \not\equiv 9, 10 \pmod{12}$. The contribution of this paper is therefore a new proof of the odd case, carried out within the bijective framework of Cornet, Dravec, and Torres.

math.CO↗

HJ numbers revisited

Hales-Jewett theorem is well known. We prove a primitive recursive bound, in fact an $\clE^5$ one, for the density version. In preparation we deal with what was the main induction step in the old proof of Hales-Jewett as a result in its own right with better bounds. Also in improving our bounds.

math.CO↗

Adjacency-degree algebras and spectral determination of graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with adjacency matrix $A$ and degree matrix $D$. Applying $A$ and $D$ repeatedly to the all-ones vector produces a space $M_G$ of functions on the vertices, and these functions are constant on the orbits of the automorphism group. We call $G$ AD-observable if $M_G$ contains the indicator vector of every orbit, and AD-separable if the functions in $M_G$ separate the orbits. Forests are AD-observable, by McKay's leaf-pruning argument. Our main result is that for every cograph, $M_G$ is spanned by the indicator vectors of the cells of the stable partition of color refinement. Hence a cograph is AD-observable, or equivalently AD-separable, exactly when color refinement finds its orbits, and we describe these cographs by their cotrees. We also show that two cographs with the same number of vertices and the same homomorphism counts from all caterpillars have the same counts from all trees. The main result does not extend to distance-hereditary graphs: we give two such graphs on nine vertices that are AD-separable but not AD-observable.

math.CO↗