Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07659

Simple Meta-Learning for HPO and CASH Using Performance Representations

Abstract

Bayesian optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization (HPO) and Combined Algorithm Selection and Hyperparameter Optimization (CASH) often relies on explicit hyperparameter encodings as surrogate inputs. In high-dimensional search spaces, however, such representations can make it difficult for standard surrogates to learn useful performance models. We instead study an alternative meta-learning representation that describes each configuration directly as its historical performance across prior tasks. This representation can be paired directly with standard surrogate models. Our scope is the iterative selection component of AutoML, deciding which configuration to evaluate next from a fixed candidate set, rather than a complete framework with features such as runtime estimation, cost-aware budgeting and ensembling. We further apply this representation to maximal marginal relevance (MMR), a diversity-based re-ranking criterion from recommender systems, as a posterior-free acquisition rule. When selecting and optimising across multiple models on the TabArena benchmark, the performance-based representation paired with a linear Bayesian ridge regression model outperforms dedicated meta-learning baselines, achieving the same tuned performance in roughly half the number of trials. For single-model HPO, it remains a competitive second. Across both benchmarks this method closely matches or improves on regret at a fraction of the complexity and cost, requiring no pre-training or tuning and scaling independently of search space dimensionality. Code for reproducing our results is available at https://github.com/EWitting/simple-metalearning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Emiel Witting, Cheng Yan, Tom Julian Viering. 2026-11-05. Simple Meta-Learning for HPO and CASH Using Performance Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07659

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

B-XAIC Dataset: Benchmarking Explainable AI for Graph Neural Networks Using Chemical Data

Understanding the reasoning behind deep learning model predictions is crucial in cheminformatics and drug discovery, where molecular design determines their properties. However, current evaluation frameworks for Explainable AI (XAI) in this domain often rely on artificial datasets or simplified tasks, employing data-derived metrics that fail to capture the complexity of real-world scenarios and lack a direct link to explanation faithfulness. To address this, we introduce B-XAIC, a novel benchmark constructed from real-world molecular data and diverse tasks with known ground-truth rationales for assigned labels. Through a comprehensive evaluation using B-XAIC, we reveal limitations of existing XAI methods for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in the molecular domain. This benchmark provides a valuable resource for gaining deeper insights into the faithfulness of XAI, facilitating the development of more reliable and interpretable models.

cs.LG↗

Machine Learning Algorithms for Improving Black Box Optimization Solvers

Black-box optimization (BBO) addresses problems where objectives are accessible only through costly queries without gradients or explicit structure. Classical derivative-free methods---line search, direct search, and model-based solvers such as Bayesian optimization---form the backbone of BBO, yet often struggle in high-dimensional, noisy, or mixed-integer settings. Recent advances use machine learning (ML) and reinforcement learning (RL) to enhance BBO: ML provides expressive surrogates, adaptive updates, meta-learning-based algorithm selection, and generative models, while the RL--BBO interface includes dynamic operator configuration, robust policy search, and meta-optimization across tasks. This paper surveys these developments, covering representative algorithms such as the modular model-based optimization framework (mlrMBO), zeroth-order adaptive momentum methods (ZO-AdaMM), automated BBO (ABBO), distributed block-wise optimization (DiBB), partition-based Bayesian optimization (SPBOpt), the transformer-based optimizer (B2Opt), diffusion-model-based BBO, surrogate-assisted RL for differential evolution (Surr-RLDE), robust BBO (RBO), coordinate-ascent MORE with step size adaptation (CAS-MORE), log-barrier stochastic gradient descent (LB-SGD), policy improvement with black-box (PIBB), and offline Q-learning with Mamba backbones (Q-Mamba). We further review benchmark efforts such as the NeurIPS 2020 BBO Challenge and the MetaBox framework. A controlled numerical study further confirms that ML-based candidate screening can improve the evaluation-budget performance of direct search and differential evolution, while the benefit remains solver-dependent.

cs.LG↗

HomID : Benchmarking Intrinsic Dimension Estimators on Homogenous Manifolds with Anisotropic Embeddings

The manifold hypothesis suggests that data lies on manifolds with smaller intrinsic dimension (ID) than their ambient dimension. However there is no empirical agreement on the estimates for ID from different estimators for realistic datasets. Thus it is important to test ID estimators (IDEs) with targeted stressors. In this work, we consider the role of anisotropy. To this end, we propose HomID, a collection of homogeneous spaces with anisotropic embedding, for benchmarking ID estimators. We observe that methods that perform well on standard benchmarks systematically degrade on HomID under identical resource allocation. We further observe that anisotropic distortion of such benchmarks also results in performance degradation. Finally, we demonstrate that controlled anisotropic distortions induce systematic shifts in the distributions on which these methods rely, providing a concrete mechanism for the resulting estimation errors in two particular IDEs. The code for the project is available at https://github.com/a-writes-code/homid

cs.LG↗