Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · cs/0606013

Good Illumination of Minimum Range

Abstract

A point p is 1-well illuminated by a set F of n point lights if p lies in the interior of the convex hull of F. This concept corresponds to triangle-guarding or well-covering. In this paper we consider the illumination range of the light sources as a parameter to be optimized. First, we solve the problem of minimizing the light sources' illumination range to 1-well illuminate a given point p. We also compute a minimal set of light sources that 1-well illuminates p with minimum illumination range. Second, we solve the problem of minimizing the light sources' illumination range to 1-well illuminate all the points of a line segment with an O(n^2) algorithm. Finally, we give an O(n^2 log n) algorithm for preprocessing the data so that one can obtain the illumination range needed to 1-well illuminate a point of a line segment in O(log n) time. These results can be applied to solve problems of 1-well illuminating a trajectory by approaching it to a polygonal path.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M. Abellanas, A. Bajuelos, G. Hernández, F. Hurtado, I. Matos, B. Palop. 2006-06-02. Good Illumination of Minimum Range. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0606013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

K-subareas partitioning subject to coinciding boundary segments of neighboring subareas

A method for the problem of partitioning an area into K subareas subject to coinciding boundary segments of neighboring subareas is presented. The given area may be non-convex and may additionally include obstacle areas. The proposed hierarchical method involves three steps: repeated bisection splitting, merging and the solution of traveling salesman problems. Geographic real-world outdoors areas data is used for the evaluation of the method. The benefit of computational simplicity at the cost of imbalanced subarea sizes is highlighted.

cs.CG↗

A Sublinear Approximation Algorithm for Minimum Dilation Trees in the Plane

The dilation of a geometric graph measures how much longer the path between pairs of points becomes when restricted to graph edges, rather than following the direct path through the ambient space. The minimum dilation tree of a point set is the spanning tree with minimum dilation, where edge lengths in the tree are given by distances in the ambient space. In the Euclidean plane, computing the minimum dilation tree is NP-hard, but no hardness of approximation result is known. On the other hand, the minimum spanning tree is an $(n-1)$-approximation to the minimum dilation tree, but no asymptotically-better approximation algorithm is known for general point sets in the Euclidean plane. We give the first sublinear approximation algorithm for the minimum dilation tree in the Euclidean plane. Our approximation ratio is $\tilde{O}(n^{14/15})$ and our algorithm runs in polynomial time. This resolves an open problem proposed by Eppstein in 1996.

cs.CG↗

Projected and Reflected Sliced Wasserstein Kernels for Persistence Diagrams

Persistence diagrams do not naturally live in a Hilbert space. Carrière, Cuturi, and Oudot embedded them in kernel methods through the Sliced Wasserstein kernel, built from the Sliced Wasserstein distance $\mathrm{SW}_1$, which is conditionally negative definite (CND). We study the projected ($\mathrm{SW}_p$) and reflected ($\mathrm{RW}_p$) Sliced Wasserstein distances for every order $p\ge1$, and compare them with the $p$-Wasserstein distance $d_p$ and with a reflected variant $d_p^r$, in which projection onto the diagonal is replaced by reflection across it. We show that $2^{1/p}d_p\le d_p^r\le 2d_p$ with sharp constants, so that $d_1^r=2d_1$ and $d_p^r$ inherits the stability of $d_p$, although it is a metric only for $p=1$. The distances $\mathrm{SW}_1$ and $\mathrm{RW}_1$ are CND metrics, and $\mathrm{RW}_1$ gives rise to a new positive definite kernel, stable with respect to $d_1$. For $p>1$, neither $\mathrm{SW}_p$ nor $\mathrm{RW}_p$ satisfies the triangle inequality, and rigorous interval-arithmetic certificates prove that $\mathrm{SW}_2$ and $\mathrm{RW}_2$ are not CND; numerical experiments suggest that the CND property fails for every $p$ above some $p^*\in(1,1.2]$. On diagrams with at most $N$ points, $\mathrm{SW}_p$ and $\mathrm{RW}_p$ are metrically equivalent to $d_p$ and $d_p^r$, with sharp upper constants. On an orbit recognition benchmark, the kernels built from $\mathrm{SW}_1$ and $\mathrm{RW}_1$ reach about 85% accuracy, outperform the persistence scale space kernel, perform on par with the persistence weighted Gaussian kernel, and are about one percentage point below the kernel built from $\mathrm{SW}_2$, which is not positive definite.

cs.CG↗