Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · cs/9811019

Locked and Unlocked Polygonal Chains in 3D

T. Biedl·E. Demaine·M. Demaine·S. Lazard·A. Lubiw·J. O'Rourke·M. Overmars·S. Robbins·I. Streinu·G. Toussaint·S. Whitesides
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we study movements of simple polygonal chains in 3D. We say that an open, simple polygonal chain can be straightened if it can be continuously reconfigured to a straight sequence of segments in such a manner that both the length of each link and the simplicity of the chain are maintained throughout the movement. The analogous concept for closed chains is convexification: reconfiguration to a planar convex polygon. Chains that cannot be straightened or convexified are called locked. While there are open chains in 3D that are locked, we show that if an open chain has a simple orthogonal projection onto some plane, it can be straightened. For closed chains, we show that there are unknotted but locked closed chains, and we provide an algorithm for convexifying a planar simple polygon in 3D with a polynomial number of moves.

Explore related subjects

cs.CGcs.DScs.RO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T. Biedl, E. Demaine, M. Demaine, S. Lazard, A. Lubiw, J. O'Rourke, M. Overmars, S. Robbins, I. Streinu, G. Toussaint, S. Whitesides. 1998-11-11. Locked and Unlocked Polygonal Chains in 3D. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9811019

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

K-subareas partitioning subject to coinciding boundary segments of neighboring subareas

A method for the problem of partitioning an area into K subareas subject to coinciding boundary segments of neighboring subareas is presented. The given area may be non-convex and may additionally include obstacle areas. The proposed hierarchical method involves three steps: repeated bisection splitting, merging and the solution of traveling salesman problems. Geographic real-world outdoors areas data is used for the evaluation of the method. The benefit of computational simplicity at the cost of imbalanced subarea sizes is highlighted.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

A Sublinear Approximation Algorithm for Minimum Dilation Trees in the Plane

The dilation of a geometric graph measures how much longer the path between pairs of points becomes when restricted to graph edges, rather than following the direct path through the ambient space. The minimum dilation tree of a point set is the spanning tree with minimum dilation, where edge lengths in the tree are given by distances in the ambient space. In the Euclidean plane, computing the minimum dilation tree is NP-hard, but no hardness of approximation result is known. On the other hand, the minimum spanning tree is an $(n-1)$-approximation to the minimum dilation tree, but no asymptotically-better approximation algorithm is known for general point sets in the Euclidean plane. We give the first sublinear approximation algorithm for the minimum dilation tree in the Euclidean plane. Our approximation ratio is $\tilde{O}(n^{14/15})$ and our algorithm runs in polynomial time. This resolves an open problem proposed by Eppstein in 1996.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Projected and Reflected Sliced Wasserstein Kernels for Persistence Diagrams

Persistence diagrams do not naturally live in a Hilbert space. Carrière, Cuturi, and Oudot embedded them in kernel methods through the Sliced Wasserstein kernel, built from the Sliced Wasserstein distance $\mathrm{SW}_1$, which is conditionally negative definite (CND). We study the projected ($\mathrm{SW}_p$) and reflected ($\mathrm{RW}_p$) Sliced Wasserstein distances for every order $p\ge1$, and compare them with the $p$-Wasserstein distance $d_p$ and with a reflected variant $d_p^r$, in which projection onto the diagonal is replaced by reflection across it. We show that $2^{1/p}d_p\le d_p^r\le 2d_p$ with sharp constants, so that $d_1^r=2d_1$ and $d_p^r$ inherits the stability of $d_p$, although it is a metric only for $p=1$. The distances $\mathrm{SW}_1$ and $\mathrm{RW}_1$ are CND metrics, and $\mathrm{RW}_1$ gives rise to a new positive definite kernel, stable with respect to $d_1$. For $p>1$, neither $\mathrm{SW}_p$ nor $\mathrm{RW}_p$ satisfies the triangle inequality, and rigorous interval-arithmetic certificates prove that $\mathrm{SW}_2$ and $\mathrm{RW}_2$ are not CND; numerical experiments suggest that the CND property fails for every $p$ above some $p^*\in(1,1.2]$. On diagrams with at most $N$ points, $\mathrm{SW}_p$ and $\mathrm{RW}_p$ are metrically equivalent to $d_p$ and $d_p^r$, with sharp upper constants. On an orbit recognition benchmark, the kernels built from $\mathrm{SW}_1$ and $\mathrm{RW}_1$ reach about 85% accuracy, outperform the persistence scale space kernel, perform on par with the persistence weighted Gaussian kernel, and are about one percentage point below the kernel built from $\mathrm{SW}_2$, which is not positive definite.

cs.CG↗