Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · gr-qc/0203104

Remarks on the mathematical origin of wave mechanics and consequences for a quantum mechanics in a gravitational field

Abstract

According to Schroedinger's ideas, classical dynamics of point particles should correspond to the " geometrical optics " limit of a linear wave equation, in the same way as ray optics is the limit of wave optics. It is shown that, using notions of modern wave theory, the " geometrical optics " analogy leads to the correspondence between a classical Hamiltonian H and a " quantum " wave equation in a natural and general way. In particular, the correspondence is unambiguous also in the case where H contains mixed terms involving momentum and position. In the line of Schroedinger's ideas, it is also attempted to justify the occurrence, in QM, of eigenvalues problems, not merely for energy, but also for momentum. It is shown that the wave functions of pure momentum states can be defined in a physically more satisfying way than by assuming plane waves. In the case of a spatially uniform force field, such momentum states have a singularity and move undeformed according to Newton's second law. The mentioned unambiguous correspondence allows to uniquely extend the Klein-Gordon relativistic wave equation to the case where a constant gravitational field is present. It is argued that Schroedinger's wave mechanics can be extended to the case with a variable gravitational field only if one accepts that the wave equation is a preferred-frame one. From this viewpoint, generally-covariant extensions of the wave equations of QM seem rather formal. Finally, it is conjectured that there is no need for a quantum gravity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mayeul Arminjon. 2002-03-28. Remarks on the mathematical origin of wave mechanics and consequences for a quantum mechanics in a gravitational field. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0203104

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

An upper bound on the minimum orbital period of black holes

Previous research has focused on establishing lower bounds on the minimum orbital period of black holes. In this work, we explore the complementary question of whether an upper bound exists for the minimum orbital period of black holes. We investigate the minimum orbital periods of three types of black holes: Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordström and Kerr-Newman black holes. We find that the minimum orbital period of these black holes is bounded by an upper limit $T_{min} \leqslant 6\sqrt{3}πM$, where $M$ is the black hole mass. Our results suggest that this upper bound on the minimum orbital period may be a general property in black hole spacetimes.

gr-qc↗

Bounds on the minimum orbital period in the background of 5-dimensional charged black holes

In this paper, we study the upper and lower bounds on the minimum orbital period of 5-dimensional charged black holes. Our results indicate that the upper bound of the minimum orbital period corresponds to non-charged black holes, while the lower bound is achieved in the case of maximally charged black holes. We further establish precise analytical expressions for the upper and lower bounds of the minimum orbital period. Our findings provide valuable insights into 5-dimensional charged black holes and help constrain theoretical gravity models.

gr-qc↗

Analysis of minimum orbital periods around d-dimensional charged black holes

This paper investigates the bounds on the minimum orbital period for test objects around d-dimensional charged black holes in asymptotically flat spacetimes. We derive the exact critical radius and the minimum orbital period. We then prove analytically that the minimum orbital period decreases strictly as the charge of the black hole increases. Thus, the upper limit is reached for an uncharged black hole, while the lower limit is attained for a maximally charged one, and the two bounds take the closed form $\frac{2π(d-2)}{d-3}[(d-2)M]^{\frac{1}{d-3}}\leqslant T_{min} \leqslant 2π\sqrt{\frac{d-1}{d-3}}\,[(d-1)M]^{\frac{1}{d-3}}$. Since the minimum period equals $2π$ times the shadow radius, the upper bound is equivalently a universal upper bound on the shadow radius. These results improve our understanding of dynamics around d-dimensional black holes and impose constraints on candidate gravity theories.

gr-qc↗