Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · gr-qc/0303107

Classical Electrodynamics in Quasi-Metric Space-Time

Abstract

The quasi-metric manifold $\cal N$ is equipped with two one-parameter families of metric tensors ${\bf {\bar g}}_t$ and ${\bf g}_t$, each parametrized by the global time function $t$. Moreover, in $({\cal N},{\bf {\bar g}}_t)$ one must define two different electromagnetic field tensor families corresponding to the active electromagnetic field tensor family ${\bf {\tilde F}}_t$ and the passive electromagnetic field tensor family ${\bf {\bar F}}_t$, respectively. The active electromagnetic field tensor family ${\bf {\tilde F}}_t$ couples to gravity. By construction, the norm of the passive electromagnetic field tensor family ${\bf {\bar F}}_t$ experiences a secular decrease, defining a global cosmic attenuation (not noticeable locally) of the electromagnetic field. Local conservation laws for passive electromagnetism imply that ${\bf {\bar {\nabla}}}{\cdot} {\bf {\bar F}}_t=0$ in electro-vacuum, ensuring that photons move on null geodesics of $({\cal N},{\bf {\bar g}}_t)$. From ${\bf {\bar F}}_t$, one may construct the passive electromagnetic field tensor family ${\bf F}_t$ in $({\cal N},{\bf g}_t)$ in the same way as ${\bf g}_t$ is constructed from ${\bf {\bar g}}_t$. This ensures that photons move on null geodesics of $({\cal N},{\bf g}_t)$ as well. As a simple example, the (exact) quasi-metric counterpart to the Reissner-Nordström solution in General Relativity is calculated. Besides, it is found that a classical charged test particle electromagnetically bound to a central charge will participate in the cosmic expansion. But since quantum-mechanical states should be unaffected by the expansion, this classic calculation is hardly relevant for quantum-mechanical systems such as atoms, so there is no reason to think that the cosmic expansion should apply to them. Finally, it is shown that the main results of geometric optics hold in quasi-metric space-time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dag Østvang. 2024-03-21. Classical Electrodynamics in Quasi-Metric Space-Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0303107

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

An upper bound on the minimum orbital period of black holes

Previous research has focused on establishing lower bounds on the minimum orbital period of black holes. In this work, we explore the complementary question of whether an upper bound exists for the minimum orbital period of black holes. We investigate the minimum orbital periods of three types of black holes: Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordström and Kerr-Newman black holes. We find that the minimum orbital period of these black holes is bounded by an upper limit $T_{min} \leqslant 6\sqrt{3}πM$, where $M$ is the black hole mass. Our results suggest that this upper bound on the minimum orbital period may be a general property in black hole spacetimes.

gr-qc↗

Bounds on the minimum orbital period in the background of 5-dimensional charged black holes

In this paper, we study the upper and lower bounds on the minimum orbital period of 5-dimensional charged black holes. Our results indicate that the upper bound of the minimum orbital period corresponds to non-charged black holes, while the lower bound is achieved in the case of maximally charged black holes. We further establish precise analytical expressions for the upper and lower bounds of the minimum orbital period. Our findings provide valuable insights into 5-dimensional charged black holes and help constrain theoretical gravity models.

gr-qc↗

Analysis of minimum orbital periods around d-dimensional charged black holes

This paper investigates the bounds on the minimum orbital period for test objects around d-dimensional charged black holes in asymptotically flat spacetimes. We derive the exact critical radius and the minimum orbital period. We then prove analytically that the minimum orbital period decreases strictly as the charge of the black hole increases. Thus, the upper limit is reached for an uncharged black hole, while the lower limit is attained for a maximally charged one, and the two bounds take the closed form $\frac{2π(d-2)}{d-3}[(d-2)M]^{\frac{1}{d-3}}\leqslant T_{min} \leqslant 2π\sqrt{\frac{d-1}{d-3}}\,[(d-1)M]^{\frac{1}{d-3}}$. Since the minimum period equals $2π$ times the shadow radius, the upper bound is equivalently a universal upper bound on the shadow radius. These results improve our understanding of dynamics around d-dimensional black holes and impose constraints on candidate gravity theories.

gr-qc↗