Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · gr-qc/0509118

On the regularization ambiguities in loop quantum gravity

Abstract

One of the main achievements of LQG is the consistent quantization of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation which is free of UV problems. However, ambiguities associated to the intermediate regularization procedure lead to an apparently infinite set of possible theories. The absence of an UV problem is intimately linked with the ambiguities arising in the quantum theory. Among these ambiguities there is the one associated to the SU(2) unitary rep. used in the diffeomorphism covariant pointsplitting regularization of nonlinear funct. of the connection. This ambiguity is labelled by a halfinteger m and, here, it is referred to as the m-ambiguity. The aim of this paper is to investigate the important implications of this ambiguity./ We first study 2+1 gravity quantized in canonical LQG. Only when the regularization of the quantum constraints is performed in terms of the fundamental rep. of the gauge group one obtains the usual TQFT. In all other cases unphysical local degrees of freedom arise at the level of the regulated theory that conspire against the existence of the continuum limit. This shows that there is a clear cut choice in the quantization of the constraints in 2+1 LQG./ We then analyze the effects of the ambiguity in 3+1 gravity exhibiting the existence of spurious solutions for higher unit. rep. quantizations of the Hamiltonian constraint. Although the analysis is not complete in D=3+1--due to the difficulties associated to the definition of the physical inner product--it provides evidence supporting the definitions quantum dynamics of loop quantum gravity in terms of the fundamental representation of the gauge group as the only consistent possibilities. If the gauge group is SO(3) we find physical solutions associated to spin-two local excitations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alejandro Perez. 2005-09-29. On the regularization ambiguities in loop quantum gravity. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.73.044007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

An upper bound on the minimum orbital period of black holes

Previous research has focused on establishing lower bounds on the minimum orbital period of black holes. In this work, we explore the complementary question of whether an upper bound exists for the minimum orbital period of black holes. We investigate the minimum orbital periods of three types of black holes: Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordström and Kerr-Newman black holes. We find that the minimum orbital period of these black holes is bounded by an upper limit $T_{min} \leqslant 6\sqrt{3}πM$, where $M$ is the black hole mass. Our results suggest that this upper bound on the minimum orbital period may be a general property in black hole spacetimes.

gr-qc↗

Bounds on the minimum orbital period in the background of 5-dimensional charged black holes

In this paper, we study the upper and lower bounds on the minimum orbital period of 5-dimensional charged black holes. Our results indicate that the upper bound of the minimum orbital period corresponds to non-charged black holes, while the lower bound is achieved in the case of maximally charged black holes. We further establish precise analytical expressions for the upper and lower bounds of the minimum orbital period. Our findings provide valuable insights into 5-dimensional charged black holes and help constrain theoretical gravity models.

gr-qc↗

Analysis of minimum orbital periods around d-dimensional charged black holes

This paper investigates the bounds on the minimum orbital period for test objects around d-dimensional charged black holes in asymptotically flat spacetimes. We derive the exact critical radius and the minimum orbital period. We then prove analytically that the minimum orbital period decreases strictly as the charge of the black hole increases. Thus, the upper limit is reached for an uncharged black hole, while the lower limit is attained for a maximally charged one, and the two bounds take the closed form $\frac{2π(d-2)}{d-3}[(d-2)M]^{\frac{1}{d-3}}\leqslant T_{min} \leqslant 2π\sqrt{\frac{d-1}{d-3}}\,[(d-1)M]^{\frac{1}{d-3}}$. Since the minimum period equals $2π$ times the shadow radius, the upper bound is equivalently a universal upper bound on the shadow radius. These results improve our understanding of dynamics around d-dimensional black holes and impose constraints on candidate gravity theories.

gr-qc↗