Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · gr-qc/0509122

Limitations of the adiabatic approximation to the gravitational self-force

Abstract

A small body moving in the field of a much larger black hole and subjected to its own gravity moves on an accelerated world line in the background spacetime of the large black hole. The acceleration is produced by the body's gravitational self-force, which is constructed from the body's retarded gravitational field. The adiabatic approximation to the gravitational self-force is obtained instead from the half-retarded minus half-advanced field; it is known to produce the same dissipative effects as the true self-force. We argue that the adiabatic approximation is limited, because it discards important conservative terms which lead to the secular evolution of some orbital elements. We argue further that this secular evolution has measurable consequences; in particular, it affects the phasing of the orbit and the phasing of the associated gravitational wave. Our argument rests on a simple toy model involving a point electric charge moving slowly in the weak gravitational field of a central mass; the charge is also subjected to its electromagnetic self-force. In this simple context the true self-force is known explicitly and it can cleanly be separated into conservative and radiation-reaction pieces. We observe that the conservative part of the self-force produces a secular regression of the orbit's periapsis. We explain how the conclusions reached on the basis of the toy model can be extended to the gravitational self-force, and to fast motions and strong fields. While the limitations of the adiabatic approximation are quite severe in a post-Newtonian context in which the motion is slow and the gravitational field weak, they appear to be less so for rapid motions and strong fields.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adam Pound, Eric Poisson, Bernhard G. Nickel. 2005-11-28. Limitations of the adiabatic approximation to the gravitational self-force. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.72.124001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

An upper bound on the minimum orbital period of black holes

Previous research has focused on establishing lower bounds on the minimum orbital period of black holes. In this work, we explore the complementary question of whether an upper bound exists for the minimum orbital period of black holes. We investigate the minimum orbital periods of three types of black holes: Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordström and Kerr-Newman black holes. We find that the minimum orbital period of these black holes is bounded by an upper limit $T_{min} \leqslant 6\sqrt{3}πM$, where $M$ is the black hole mass. Our results suggest that this upper bound on the minimum orbital period may be a general property in black hole spacetimes.

gr-qc↗

Bounds on the minimum orbital period in the background of 5-dimensional charged black holes

In this paper, we study the upper and lower bounds on the minimum orbital period of 5-dimensional charged black holes. Our results indicate that the upper bound of the minimum orbital period corresponds to non-charged black holes, while the lower bound is achieved in the case of maximally charged black holes. We further establish precise analytical expressions for the upper and lower bounds of the minimum orbital period. Our findings provide valuable insights into 5-dimensional charged black holes and help constrain theoretical gravity models.

gr-qc↗

Analysis of minimum orbital periods around d-dimensional charged black holes

This paper investigates the bounds on the minimum orbital period for test objects around d-dimensional charged black holes in asymptotically flat spacetimes. We derive the exact critical radius and the minimum orbital period. We then prove analytically that the minimum orbital period decreases strictly as the charge of the black hole increases. Thus, the upper limit is reached for an uncharged black hole, while the lower limit is attained for a maximally charged one, and the two bounds take the closed form $\frac{2π(d-2)}{d-3}[(d-2)M]^{\frac{1}{d-3}}\leqslant T_{min} \leqslant 2π\sqrt{\frac{d-1}{d-3}}\,[(d-1)M]^{\frac{1}{d-3}}$. Since the minimum period equals $2π$ times the shadow radius, the upper bound is equivalently a universal upper bound on the shadow radius. These results improve our understanding of dynamics around d-dimensional black holes and impose constraints on candidate gravity theories.

gr-qc↗