Low Q^2 low x structure function analysis of CCFR data for F2

CCFR Collaboration; B. H. Tamminga; T. Adams; A. Alton; C. G. Arroyo; S. Avvakumov; L. de Barbaro; P. de Barbaro; A. O. Bazarko; R. H. Bernstein; A. Bodek; T. Bolton; J. Brau; D. Buchholz; H. Budd; L. Bugel; J. Conrad; R. B. Drucker; J. A. Formaggio; R. Frey; J. Goldman; M. Goncharov; D. A. Harris; R. A. Johnson; J. H. Kim; B. J. King; T. Kinnel; S. Koutsoliotas; M. J. Lamm; W. Marsh; D. Mason; K. S. McFarland; C. McNulty; S. R. Mishra; D. Naples; P. Nienaber; A. Romosan; W. K. Sakumoto; H. Schellman; F. J. Sciulli; W. G. Seligman; M. H. Shaevitz; W. H. Smith; P. Spentzouris; E. G. Stern; M. Vakili; A. Vaitaitis; V. Wu; U. K. Yang; J. Yu; G. P. Zeller; E. D. Zimmerman

doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00613-2

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · hep-ex/9908064

Low Q^2 low x structure function analysis of CCFR data for F2

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Analyses of structure functions (SFs) from neutrino and muon deep inelastic scattering data have shown discrepancies in F2 for x < 0.1. A new SF analysis of the CCFR collaboration data examining regions in x down to x=.0015 and 0.4 < Q^2 < 1.0 is presented. Comparison to corrected charged lepton scattering results for F2 from the NMC and E665 experiments are made. Differences between muon and neutrino scattering allow that the behavior of F2 from muon scattering could be different from F2 from neutrino scattering as Q^2 approaches zero. Comparisons between F2 muon and F2 neutrino are made in this limit.

Explore related subjects

hep-ex

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

CCFR Collaboration, B. H. Tamminga, T. Adams, A. Alton, C. G. Arroyo, S. Avvakumov, L. de Barbaro, P. de Barbaro, A. O. Bazarko, R. H. Bernstein, A. Bodek, T. Bolton, J. Brau, D. Buchholz, H. Budd, L. Bugel, J. Conrad, R. B. Drucker, J. A. Formaggio, R. Frey, J. Goldman, M. Goncharov, D. A. Harris, R. A. Johnson, J. H. Kim, B. J. King, T. Kinnel, S. Koutsoliotas, M. J. Lamm, W. Marsh, D. Mason, K. S. McFarland, C. McNulty, S. R. Mishra, D. Naples, P. Nienaber, A. Romosan, W. K. Sakumoto, H. Schellman, F. J. Sciulli, W. G. Seligman, M. H. Shaevitz, W. H. Smith, P. Spentzouris, E. G. Stern, M. Vakili, A. Vaitaitis, V. Wu, U. K. Yang, J. Yu, G. P. Zeller, E. D. Zimmerman. 1999-08-30. Low Q^2 low x structure function analysis of CCFR data for F2. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00613-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The mathematical theory of photomultiplier tube calibration

In this technical note we describe the main features of the mathematical theory of photomultiplier tube (PMT) calibration. Attention was paid to explain the various arguments and concepts in a simple and pedagogical manner that everybody understands. The basic operational principles of a PMT are discussed from a theoretical standpoint. The essential steps of its function (photoconversion, focusing, multiplication, etc.) are laid down together with the mathematical schemes necessary to model the charge output of a PMT when illuminated by a faint poissonian light source. In case of important omissions we direct the reader to some of the standard references. The most common numerical methods, used to calculate the charge amplification function $S_R(x)$, are also presented. As an example, we plot $S_R(x)$ utilizing a gamma function model for the single photoelectron (SPE) response and showcase its main characteristics. The basic techniques for gain calibration are also introduced, and we probed their precision using toy Monte Carlo data. Additionally, data from a Hamamatsu R1408 PMT were analyzed. Finally, we show how the presence of soft charge component can affect the results of gain determination. We conclude this report with some general comments regarding \emph{in situ} calibration of large-scale detectors. We hope that this document can serve as a reference for students and young researchers that want to learn more about the theory of PMT calibration.

hep-ex↗

arXiv2026

First measurement of the forward rapidity dependence of $W$ boson transverse helicity fractions

The transverse helicity fractions of $W$ bosons are measured as a function of the $W$ boson rapidity, $y_{W}$, in the range $0 \leq y_{W} \leq 5$ using $W\toμν_μ$ decays in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV recorded by the LHCb experiment and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $5.1$ fb$^{-1}$. The fractions are extracted from a template fit to the muon transverse momentum and pseudorapidity. The results show a strong rapidity dependence and agree with next-to-leading-order Standard Model predictions, providing the first determination of the transverse helicity fractions of $W$ bosons in the forward region.

hep-ex↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Nucleon Production in Hadron Interactions Relevant for GeV-scale Neutrino Experiments

In neutrino scattering experiments, the emitted final state particles are essential for identifying interaction channels and reconstructing neutrino energies. During intranuclear propagation, neutrino-induced hadrons can interact with surrounding nucleons, altering both the number of final state particles and detectable energy depositions. As a result, neutrino experiments rely on hadron-nucleus scattering models to simulate these nuclear effects. This paper explores nucleon production predicted by hadron scattering models for common hadrons in neutrino experiments, specifically nucleons and pions. We investigate these models with simulations from the \textsc{GENIE} neutrino event generator, which includes implementations of \textsc{Geant4} Bertini Cascade and \textsc{INCL++}. For popular target nuclei, we find that the number of emitted nucleons for mesonless hadron interactions can be parameterized by simple Gaussian and exponential decay functions. We present these relationships and provide reweighting tools for addressing the hadron scattering model spread in both visible energy and final state nucleon multiplicities.

hep-ex↗