Search arXivSearch

arXiv · math/0011145

Small Elliptic Quantum Group $e_{tau,γ}(sl_N)$

Abstract

The small elliptic quantum group $e_{τ,γ}(sl_N)$, introduced in the paper, is an elliptic dynamical analogue of the universal enveloping algebra $U(sl_n)$. We define highest weight modules, Verma modules and contragradient modules over $e_{τ,γ}(sl_N)$, the dynamical Shapovalov form for $e_{τ,γ}(sl_N)$ and the contravariant form for highest weight $e_{τ,γ}(sl_N)$-modules. We show that any finite-dimensional $sl_N$-module and any Verma module over $sl_N$ can be lifted to the corresponding $e_{τ,γ}(sl_N)$-module on the same vector space. For the elliptic quantum group $E_{τ,γ}(sl_N)$ we construct the evaluation morphism $E_{τ,γ}(sl_N)\to e_{τ,γ}(sl_N)$, thus making any $e_{τ,γ}(sl_N)$-module into an evaluation $E_{τ,γ}(sl_N)$-module.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V. Tarasov, A. Varchenko. 2001-05-14. Small Elliptic Quantum Group $e_{tau,γ}(sl_N)$. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0011145

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Categorification of quasi-split iquantum groups

We introduce a new family of graded 2-categories generalizing the 2-quantum groups introduced by Khovanov, Lauda and Rouquier. We use them to categorify quasi-split iquantum groups in all symmetric types.

math.QA

The Ring of Differential Operators on a Nodal Curve is not a Bialgebroid

In a previous article, we showed that local projectivity is a sufficient condition for the existence of a bialgebroid structure on the ring of differential operators on an affine variety. In this note, we show using elementary methods that the ring of differential operators on a nodal curve is neither locally projective nor does it admit a bialgebroid structure.

math.QA

Coset representatives corresponding to Yetter-Drinfeld modules of modular group and continued fraction

We give complete conjugacy classes of modular group SL(2,Z). Particularly, the conjugacy classes of hyperbolic elements are decided by the proper equivalence classes of indefinite forms, and we give an example. Finally, we describe the coset representatives of centralizer of S, ST, T and hyperbolic elements of SL(2,Z) by regular continued fraction. In conclusion, most Nichols algebras over modular group are infinite-dimensional except Proposition 4.10.

math.QA