Search arXivSearch

arXiv · math/0103002

Geometry without topology as a new conception of geometry

Abstract

A geometric conception is a method of a geometry construction. The Riemannian geometric conception and a new T-geometric one are considered. T-geometry is built only on the basis of information included in the metric (distance between two points). Such geometric concepts as dimension, manifold, metric tensor, curve are fundamental in the Riemannian conception of geometry, and they are derivative in the T-geometric one. T-geometry is the simplest geometric conception (essentially only finite point sets are investigated) and simultaneously it is the most general one. It is insensitive to the space continuity and has a new property -- nondegeneracy. Fitting the T-geometry metric with the metric tensor of Riemannian geometry, one can compare geometries, constructed on the basis of different conceptions. The comparison shows that along with similarity (the same system of geodesics, the same metric) there is a difference. There is an absolute parallelism in T-geometry, but it is absent in the Riemannian geometry. In T-geometry any space region is isometrically embeddable in the space, whereas in Riemannian geometry only convex region is isometrically embeddable. T-geometric conception appears to be more consistent logically, than the Riemannian one.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuri A. Rylov. 2001-03-01. Geometry without topology as a new conception of geometry. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0103002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Godbersen's conjecture and the $L_p$-Rogers-Shephard inequality

We prove that the mixed volume of a convex body of fixed positive volume with its reflection about the origin is maximized by simplices. This confirms a conjecture of C. Godbersen from 1938 and refines the classical Rogers-Shephard inequality. We also prove that simplices are the only extremizers among convex polytopes. Finally, we use this inequality to prove an $L_p$-version of the Rogers-Shephard inequality for convex bodies containing the origin and show that, for any $p\in(1,\infty]$, the only extremizers are simplices with a vertex at the origin.

math.MG

Tight Stability Estimates Near the Simplex and Applications for the Banach-Mazur Distance and Rogers-Shephard-Type Inequalities

We establish a tight stability estimate for the Minkowski asymmetry near its maximal value, improving earlier results in both the range for the admissible error and the strength of the estimate. More precisely, if an $n$-dimensional convex body $K$ has Minkowski asymmetry $s(K) \geq n-\varepsilon$ for $\varepsilon \in [0,1)$, then its Banach-Mazur distance to the $n$-simplex is at most \[ 1 + \varepsilon + \frac{\varepsilon^2}{2(1-\varepsilon)}. \] This dimension-independent estimate is sharp to the linear order in $\varepsilon$, including the constant. We apply this estimate to several problems. First, we prove a stability result for the maximal Banach-Mazur distance to the Euclidean ball, improving a previous estimate to the optimal linear order. As a key ingredient, we verify the conjecture that every convex body $K$ contains a translated copy of its volume-minimal circumscribed ellipsoid scaled down by a factor $\sqrt{n s(K)}$. Second, we prove a sharp common generalization of Schneider's higher-order Rogers-Shephard inequality and the $L_p$-Rogers-Shephard inequality, and establish a stability result of the optimal linear order. These results are based on the recent positive answer to the inequality part of the higher-order Godbersen conjecture and the accompanying proof of the $L_p$-Rogers-Shephard inequality. Finally, we improve upper bounds for the diameter of the Banach-Mazur compactum in fixed dimensions.

math.MG

Busemann G-spaces with convex balls

We prove that any Busemann G-space such that every sufficiently small metric ball is convex is a topological manifold. The key ingredient in the proof is Ivanov's Helly theorem. The appendix contains a counterexample to a question of Berestovskii--Halverson--Repovš.

math.MG