Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · math/0304359

A Reciprocity Theorem for Monomer-Dimer Coverings

Abstract

The problem of counting monomer-dimer coverings of a lattice is a longstanding problem in statistical mechanics. It has only been exactly solved for the special case of dimer coverings in two dimensions. In earlier work, Stanley proved a reciprocity principle governing the number $N(m,n)$ of dimer coverings of an $m$ by $n$ rectangular grid (also known as perfect matchings), where $m$ is fixed and $n$ is allowed to vary. As reinterpreted by Propp, Stanley's result concerns the unique way of extending $N(m,n)$ to $n < 0$ so that the resulting bi-infinite sequence, $N(m,n)$ for $n \in {Z}$, satisfies a linear recurrence relation with constant coefficients. In particular, Stanley shows that $N(m,n)$ is always an integer satisfying the relation $N(m,-2-n) = ε_{m,n}N(m,n)$ where $ε_{m,n} = 1$ unless $m\equiv$ 2(mod 4) and $n$ is odd, in which case $ε_{m,n} = -1$. Furthermore, Propp's method is applicable to higher-dimensional cases. This paper discusses similar investigations of the numbers $M(m,n)$, of monomer-dimer coverings, or equivalently (not necessarily perfect) matchings of an $m$ by $n$ rectangular grid. We show that for each fixed $m$ there is a unique way of extending $M(m,n)$ to $n < 0$ so that the resulting bi-infinite sequence, $M(m,n)$ for $n \in {Z}$, satisfies a linear recurrence relation with constant coefficients. We show that $M(m,n)$, a priori a rational number, is always an integer, using a generalization of the combinatorial model offered by Propp. Lastly, we give a new statement of reciprocity in terms of multivariate generating functions from which Stanley's result follows.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N. Anzalone, J. Baldwin, I. Bronshtein, T. K. Petersen. 2003-05-20. A Reciprocity Theorem for Monomer-Dimer Coverings. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0304359

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Domination in Johnson graphs J(n, 3) for odd n

In 2025 Cornet, Dravec, and Torres determined the domination number $γ(J(n,3))$ of the Johnson graph for every even $n \ge 6$, expressing it as a closed form $ϕ_n$ in terms of Fort-Hedlund covering numbers, and conjectured the same value for odd $n$. We prove this conjecture: $γ(J(n,3)) = ϕ_n$ for every odd $n \ge 7$. A dominating set of $J(n,3)$ is the same as a lotto design $\mathrm{LD}(n,3,3,2)$, and the lotto numbers $L(n,3,3,2)$, and hence $γ(J(n,3))$, were already determined for every $n$ by Bate (1978) and by Brouwer (1981); a short degree argument of Füredi, Székely, and Zubor (1996) gives the same lower bound for all $n \not\equiv 9, 10 \pmod{12}$. The contribution of this paper is therefore a new proof of the odd case, carried out within the bijective framework of Cornet, Dravec, and Torres.

math.CO↗

HJ numbers revisited

Hales-Jewett theorem is well known. We prove a primitive recursive bound, in fact an $\clE^5$ one, for the density version. In preparation we deal with what was the main induction step in the old proof of Hales-Jewett as a result in its own right with better bounds. Also in improving our bounds.

math.CO↗

Adjacency-degree algebras and spectral determination of graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with adjacency matrix $A$ and degree matrix $D$. Applying $A$ and $D$ repeatedly to the all-ones vector produces a space $M_G$ of functions on the vertices, and these functions are constant on the orbits of the automorphism group. We call $G$ AD-observable if $M_G$ contains the indicator vector of every orbit, and AD-separable if the functions in $M_G$ separate the orbits. Forests are AD-observable, by McKay's leaf-pruning argument. Our main result is that for every cograph, $M_G$ is spanned by the indicator vectors of the cells of the stable partition of color refinement. Hence a cograph is AD-observable, or equivalently AD-separable, exactly when color refinement finds its orbits, and we describe these cographs by their cotrees. We also show that two cographs with the same number of vertices and the same homomorphism counts from all caterpillars have the same counts from all trees. The main result does not extend to distance-hereditary graphs: we give two such graphs on nine vertices that are AD-separable but not AD-observable.

math.CO↗