Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · math/0307388

P is not equal to NP intersect coNP for Infinite Time Turing Machines

Vinay Deolalikar·Joel David Hamkins·Ralf-Dieter Schindler
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Extending results of Schindler [math.LO/0106087] and Hamkins and Welch [math.LO/0212046], we establish in the context of infinite time Turing machines that P is properly contained in NP intersect coNP. Furthermore, NP intersect coNP is exactly the class of hyperarithmetic sets. For the more general classes, we establish that P+ = (NP+ intersect coNP+) = (NP intersect coNP), though P++ is properly contained in NP++ intersect coNP++. Within any contiguous block of infinite clockable ordinals, we show that P_alpha is not equal to NP_alpha intersect coNP_alpha, but if beta begins a gap in the clockable ordinals, then P_beta = NP_beta intersect coNP_beta. Finally, we establish that P^f is not equal to NP^f intersect coNP^f for most functions f from the reals to the ordinals, although we provide examples where P^f = NP^f intersect coNP^f and P^f is not equal to NP^f.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vinay Deolalikar, Joel David Hamkins, Ralf-Dieter Schindler. 2003-07-30. P is not equal to NP intersect coNP for Infinite Time Turing Machines. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0307388

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Loops, Inverse Limits and Non-Determinism

We introduce an operator on problems in Weihrauch complexity, which we call the infinite loop or inverse limit, and which corresponds to an infinite compositional product. This operation arises naturally whenever one implements algorithms that produce a sequence of results in an infinite loop, using some fixed subroutine. We prove that the corresponding operator is monotone with respect to (strong) Weihrauch reducibility but that it is not a closure operator. One of our findings is that weak Kőnig's lemma is closed under infinite loops, which implies that the class of non-deterministically computable problems is also closed under this operation. Consequently, this class allows for a high degree of flexibility in programming. As our main technical tools, we present an injective version of the recursion theorem and an infinitary version of the so-called independent choice theorem. We also show that, in general, the infinite loop operator is more powerful than the composition of the diamond operator followed by the parallelization operator. However, in many practical scenarios, these compositions yield a result, which coincides with the application of the infinite loop operator. Finally, we discuss the special situation of loops for single-valued problems and for problems on Turing degrees.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Scott topologies on meet-continuous domains

We study Scott products and sobriety of countable meet-continuous domains, meaning meet-continuous dcpos without any additional continuity or least-element assumption. Using the complete-lattice test-family theorem of Xu and Ji, we prove finite-product equality for those domains that are $L$-dcpos, and for the weaker class whose principal ideals have suprema of all nonempty subsets. For an arbitrary family of nonempty countable meet-continuous $L$-dcpos, we prove that the Scott topology on the order product equals the product of the factor Scott topologies if and only if only finitely many factors lack a least element. We also establish sobriety under bounded completeness and under additional common-upper-bound conditions. Assuming square-product equality, sobriety is characterized by Scott closedness of common-upper-bound sections associated with irreducible Scott-closed sets, with an equivalent sequential formulation in the countable case. Two extraction lemmas extend to meet-semilattice dcpos. The finite-product and sobriety questions for general countable meet-continuous domains remain unresolved here.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Randomized Borel $(2d+1)$-coloring of digraphs

Let $G$ be a Borel digraph with maximum out-degree $d \in \mathbb{N}$. We show that $G$ admits a random Borel $(2d+1)$-coloring for which every edge is almost surely not monochromatic. This gives a simpler proof of a recent result of Pelayo-Gómez: such a graph $G$ admits a measurable proper $(2d+1)$-coloring with respect to any Borel probability measure on $V(G)$. Our proof is an adaptation of Pelayo-Gómez's proof to the randomized Borel setting.

math.LO↗