Spiral Chains: A New Proof of the Four Color Theorem

I. Cahit

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · math/0408247

Spiral Chains: A New Proof of the Four Color Theorem

I. Cahit

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Acceptable but due to extensive usage of a computer rather unpleasant proof of the famous four color map problem of Francis Guthrie were settled eventually by W. Appel and K. Haken in 1976. Using the same method but shortening the proof twenty years later by another team, namely N. Robertson, D.P. Sanders, P.D. Seymour and R. Thomas would not improve considerably the readability of the proof either. Thus it has been widely accepted the need of more elegant and readable proof. There are considerable number of equivalent formulations of the problem but none of them promising for a possible non-computer proofs. On the other hand known proofs are used the concept of Kempe chain and reducibility of the configurations which were a century old ideas. With these in mind we have introduced a new concept which we call "spiral chains" in the maximal planar graphs. We have shown that for any maximal graph as long as spiral chains are being used we do not need the fifth color. Henceforth this paper offers another proof to the four color theorem which is not based on deep and abstract theories from the other branches of mathematics or using computing power of computers, but rather completely on a new idea in graph theory.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

I. Cahit. 2004-08-18. Spiral Chains: A New Proof of the Four Color Theorem. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0408247

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO↗